IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iatdps/2204.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

High-tech left behind? Lessons from the Ruhr cybersecurity ecosystem for approaches to develop "left behind" places

Author

Listed:
  • Butzin, Anna
  • Flögel, Franz

Abstract

The attention to "left behind" places triggered a debate about alternative development approaches. Unlike prosperous regions and their prioritisation on high-tech sectors, strategies for left behind places should shift to the foundational economy, community-based social innovation and well-being. While supporting this emphasis, we see a tendency to neglect importance of research and teaching in high-tech areas for developing left behind places. Our case study in the old industrial region Ruhr shows, how unrelated initial funding for cutting-edge research sparked the development of today's cybersecurity ecosystem. The ecosystem contributes to a positive identification within the region and a dynamic start-up landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Butzin, Anna & Flögel, Franz, 2022. "High-tech left behind? Lessons from the Ruhr cybersecurity ecosystem for approaches to develop "left behind" places," IAT Discussion Papers 22/04, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iatdps:2204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/260526/1/1806755653.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arocena, Rodrigo & Sutz, Judith, 2021. "Universities and social innovation for global sustainable development as seen from the south," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Zademach, Hans-Martin & Dudek, Simon, 2022. "Soziale Infrastruktur und räumliche Gerechtigkeit: Zum Potenzial des Ansatzes der Fundamentalökonomie," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Miosga, Manfred & Dudek, Simon & Klee, Andreas (ed.), Neue Perspektiven für eine zukunftsfähige Raumordnung in Bayern, volume 35, pages 138-150, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    3. Pedro Marques & Kevin Morgan & Adrian Healy & Paul Vallance, 2019. "Spaces of novelty: Can universities play a catalytic role in less developed regions?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(5), pages 763-771.
    4. Ron Martin, 2021. "Rebuilding the economy from the Covid crisis: time to rethink regional studies?," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 143-161, January.
    5. Noack, Anika & Federwisch, Tobias, 2020. "Social Innovation in Rural Regions: Older Adults and Creative Community Development," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 85(4), pages 1021-1044.
    6. Sara Moreno Pires & Alexandra Polido & Filipe Teles & Pedro Silva & Carlos Rodrigues, 2020. "Territorial innovation models in less developed regions in Europe: the quest for a new research agenda?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(8), pages 1639-1666, August.
    7. Ewald Engelen & Julie Froud & Sukhdev Johal & Angelo Salento & Karel Williams, 2017. "The grounded city: from competitivity to the foundational economy," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 407-423.
    8. Pedro Marques & Kevin Morgan & Ranald Richardson, 2018. "Social innovation in question: The theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(3), pages 496-512, May.
    9. David Doloreux & Steve Dionne, 2008. "Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 259-283, May.
    10. Paul Benneworth & Jorge Cunha & Ridvan Cinar, 2020. "Between Good Intentions and Enthusiastic Professors: The Missing Middle of University Social Innovation Structures in the Quadruple Helix," Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics, in: Luís Farinha & Domingos Santos & João J. Ferreira & Marina Ranga (ed.), Regional Helix Ecosystems and Sustainable Growth, pages 31-44, Springer.
    11. Maria Salomaa, 2019. "Third mission and regional context: assessing universities’ entrepreneurial architecture in rural regions," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 233-249, January.
    12. Michaela Trippl & Tanja Sinozic & Helen Lawton Smith, 2015. "The Role of Universities in Regional Development: Conceptual Models and Policy Institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1722-1740, September.
    13. Julie Froud & Colin Haslam & Sukhdev Johal & Karel Williams, 2020. "(How) does productivity matter in the foundational economy?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(4), pages 316-336, June.
    14. Bellandi, Marco & Donati, Letizia & Cataneo, Alessandra, 2021. "Social innovation governance and the role of universities: Cases of quadruple helix partnerships in Italy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    15. Maria Rabadjieva & Anna Butzin, 2020. "Emergence and diffusion of social innovation through practice fields," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 925-940, July.
    16. Judith Terstriep & Gorgi Krlev & Georg Mildenberger & Simone Strambach & Jan-Frederik Thurmann & Laura-Fee Wloka, 2021. "Measuring social innovation," Chapters, in: Jürgen Howaldt & Christoph Kaletka & Antonius Schröder (ed.), A Research Agenda for Social Innovation, chapter 15, pages 263-286, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Chrys Gunasekara, 2006. "Reframing the Role of Universities in the Development of Regional Innovation Systems," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 101-113, January.
    18. Compagnucci, Lorenzo & Spigarelli, Francesca, 2020. "The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    19. Erica Kim Man Lee & Ho Lee & Chi Hing Kee & Chi Hong Kwan & Chui Ha Ng, 2021. "Social Impact Measurement in Incremental Social Innovation," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 69-86, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Souza João-Roland, Iraci & Granados, Maria L., 2023. "Towards social innovation strategy: An analysis of UK social enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Daniel A. Salas & Paulina Criollo & Angel D. Ramirez, 2021. "The Role of Higher Education Institutions in the Implementation of Circular Economy in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Danny MacKinnon & Louise Kempton & Peter O’Brien & Emma Ormerod & Andy Pike & John Tomaney, 2022. "Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places [The shadow of the Pithead: understanding social and political attitudes in former coal mining communities in the UK]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(1), pages 39-56.
    4. Joanna Morawska-Jancelewicz, 2022. "The Role of Universities in Social Innovation Within Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Model: Practical Implications from Polish Experience," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2230-2271, September.
    5. Annamaria Demarinis Loiotile & Francesco De Nicolò & Adriana Agrimi & Loredana Bellantuono & Marianna La Rocca & Alfonso Monaco & Ester Pantaleo & Sabina Tangaro & Nicola Amoroso & Roberto Bellotti, 2022. "Best Practices in Knowledge Transfer: Insights from Top Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Mikhail Martynovich & Teis Hansen & Karl-Johan Lundquist, 2023. "Can foundational economy save regions in crisis?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 577-599.
    7. Mikhail Martynovich & Teis Hansen & Karl-Johan Lundquist, 2023. "Can foundational economy save regions in crisis?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 577-599.
    8. Tatyana Tolstykh & Leyla Gamidullaeva & Nadezhda Shmeleva, 2021. "Universities as Knowledge Integrators and Cross-Industry Ecosystems: Self-Organizational Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, February.
    9. Laura Reynolds & Dylan Henderson & Chen Xu & Laura Norris, 2021. "Digitalisation and the foundational economy: A digital opportunity or a digital divide for less-developed regions?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(6), pages 451-467, September.
    10. Jonas Meyer & Michael Pillei & Friedrich Zimmermann & Gernot Stöglehner, 2018. "Customized Education as a Framework for Strengthening Collaboration between Higher Education Institutions and Regional Actors in Sustainable Development—Lessons from Albania and Kosovo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Torben Schubert & Henning Kroll, 2016. "Universities’ effects on regional GDP and unemployment: The case of Germany," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(3), pages 467-489, August.
    12. Jos van den Broek & Franziska Eckardt & Paul Benneworth, 2017. "The transformative role of universities in regional innovation systems," CHEPS Working Papers 201705, University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).
    13. Jari Kolehmainen & Joe Irvine & Linda Stewart & Zoltan Karacsonyi & Tünde Szabó & Juha Alarinta & Anders Norberg, 2016. "Quadruple Helix, Innovation and the Knowledge-Based Development: Lessons from Remote, Rural and Less-Favoured Regions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(1), pages 23-42, March.
    14. Riikka Kangas & Timo Aarrevaara, 2020. "Higher Education Institutions as Knowledge Brokers in Smart Specialisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Jose-Maria Garcia-Alvarez-Coque & Norat Roig-Tierno & Mercedes Sanchez-Garcia & Francisco Mas-Verdu, 2021. "Knowledge Drivers, Business Collaboration and Competitiveness in Rural and Urban Regions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 9-27, August.
    16. T. Theeranattapong & D. Pickernell & C. Simms, 2021. "Systematic literature review paper: the regional innovation system-university-science park nexus," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2017-2050, December.
    17. Sánchez-Barrioluengo, Mabel & Benneworth, Paul, 2019. "Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university's structural configuration on third mission performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 206-218.
    18. Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Boschma, Ron, 2022. "Do scientific capabilities in specific domains matter for technological diversification in European regions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    19. Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Rizzoli, Valentina & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. David Doloreux & David Rangdrol & Émilie Dionne, 2010. "Francophone Minority Economic Development in Canada: Addressing Political or Economic Issues?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 24(2), pages 143-153, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    left behind places; entrepreneurial ecosystem; cybersecurity; hightech sectors; regional development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iatdps:2204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iatgede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.