IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hbsmbr/71.html

Die Rolle institutioneller Investoren als Eigentümer börsennotierter Gesellschaften in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Bessler, Wolfgang
  • Rapp, Marc Steffen

Abstract

Die Anzahl börsennotierter Unternehmen in Deutschland ist seit 2001 deutlich zurückgegangen und lag im Jahr 2018 mit 403 Unternehmen um 46% unter der Anzahl von 2001 (748). Maßstab ist hier die Anzahl der im CDAX gelisteten Unternehmen mit Sitz in Deutschland. Im gleichen Zeitraum verringerte sich unter den Unternehmen des Prime Standard der Anteil jener Unternehmen deutlich, die über einen Großaktionär mit einem Anteilsbesitz von mindestens 25% verfügen. Besonders stark ausgeprägt war dieser Rückgang bei Ankeraktionären mit mindestens 50-prozentiger Beteiligungsquote (von 34% 2001 auf 28% 2018). Mit dieser Entwicklung geht ein erhöhter Anteil an Streubesitz an den betreffenden Unternehmen einher. Eine stärkere Bedeutung institutioneller Investoren mit nennenswerten Beteiligungsquoten, insbesondere jenseits der Meldeschwelle von 3%, ist jedoch nur für den DAX-30 eindeutig festzustellen. Auch ein relativer Bedeutungszuwachs von passiven (ETFs, Indexfonds), in Relation zu aktiv gemanagten Fonds, ist insbesondere für den DAX-30 festzustellen. Hier fällt der Anstieg der Beteiligungsquote passiver Fonds von 1,3% (2007) auf 8,1% (2017) jedoch durchaus erheblich aus. Institutionelle Investoren aus dem angelsächsischen Raum, speziell aus den Vereinigten Staaten, konnten ihre Beteiligungsquoten an den Unternehmen des Prima Standard seit 2007 signifikant steigern. Besonders attraktiv scheinen für institutionelle Anleger aus empirischer Sicht solche Unternehmen zu sein, die relativ groß sind (gemessen an der logarithmierten Mitarbeiterzahl), die über relativ wenige Paketaktionäre verfügen, die aus besonders profitablen Industrien stammen und die über eher geringe Sachanlagequoten verfügen.

Suggested Citation

  • Bessler, Wolfgang & Rapp, Marc Steffen, 2022. "Die Rolle institutioneller Investoren als Eigentümer börsennotierter Gesellschaften in Deutschland," Mitbestimmungsreport 71, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsmbr:71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/251124/1/1793896488.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alhashel, Bader, 2015. "Sovereign Wealth Funds: A literature review," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alkis Theonas Pitelis & Christos Pitelis, 2016. "New Roles that Key Developing Countries Will Have in the Provision of Finance for Europe," Working papers wpaper138, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    2. Ryan M. Yonk, 2023. "Building a Legacy? North Dakota’s Oil and Gas Legacy Fund an Exercise in Public Policy and Political Action," Public Administration Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Otchere, Isaac & Phan, Hanh Hong Thi, 2025. "Value effects of sovereign wealth funds' exclusionary policies: The case of the Norwegian government pension fund-global (NGPF-G)," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Jackson, Jeremy, 2018. "Prairie Prosperity: An Economic Guide for the State of North Dakota," Annals of Computational Economics, George Mason University, Mercatus Center, October.
    5. Gangi, Francesco & Meles, Antonio & Mustilli, Mario & Graziano, Domenico & Varrone, Nicola, 2019. "Do investment determinants and effects vary across sovereign wealth fund categories? A firm-level analysis," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 438-457.
    6. Gangi, Francesco & Mustilli, Mario & Varrone, Nicola & Graziano, Domenico, 2023. "Target firms’ characteristics and the effects of sovereign wealth funds’ investments: Does cultural context of SWFs matter?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Ciarlone, Alessio & Miceli, Valeria, 2016. "Escaping financial crises? Macro evidence from sovereign wealth funds' investment behaviour," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 169-196.
    8. Biancone, Paolo Pietro & Radwan, Maha, 2018. "Sharia-Compliant financing for public utility infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 88-94.
    9. K.S.Reddy, 2019. "Pot the ball? Sovereign wealth funds’ outward FDI in times of global financial market turbulence: A yield institutions-based view," Central Bank Review, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, vol. 19(4), pages 129-139.
    10. Balestra, Anna & Caruso, Raul & Di Domizio, Marco, 2024. "What explains the size of Sovereign Wealth Funds? A panel analysis (2008–2018)," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    11. Knut Anton Mork & Fabian Andsem Harang & Haakon Andreas Tr{o}nnes & Vegard Skonseng Bjerketvedt, 2022. "Dynamic spending and portfolio decisions with a soft social norm," Papers 2212.10053, arXiv.org.
    12. Shigeto Kitano & Kenya Takaku, 2023. "Effect of sovereign wealth funds in commodity‐exporting economies when commodity prices affect interest spreads," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 37(3), pages 267-292, September.
    13. Peng Liu & Nathan Mauck & S. McKay Price, 2020. "Are Government Owned Investment Funds Created Equal? Evidence from Sovereign Wealth Fund Real Estate Acquisitions," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 698-729, November.
    14. Martinez-Oviedo, Raul & Medda, Francesca, 2017. "Assessing the effects of adding timberland and farmland into resource-based Sovereign Wealth Fund portfolios," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 24-40.
    15. Christopher R. McIntosh & Neil A. Wilmot & Adrienne Dinneen & Jason F. Shogren, 2022. "Minnesota—too late for a Sovereign Wealth Fund?," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(1), pages 67-85, March.
    16. Kyunghoon Kim & Andy Sumner, 2019. "De-industrialization, re-industrialization, and the resurgence of state capitalism: The case of Indonesia," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-87, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra & Anna Grosman & Geoffrey T. Wood, 2023. "Cross-country variations in sovereign wealth funds’ transparency," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(3), pages 306-329, September.
    18. Mork, Knut Anton & Harang, Fabian Andsem & Trønnes, Haakon Andreas & Bjerketvedt, Vegard Skonseng, 2023. "Dynamic spending and portfolio decisions with a soft social norm," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Mehmet AKYOL & Barýþ YILDIZ, 2017. "Impact of size of the National Asset Funds on Economic Development: Panel Data Analysis on Select Nations," Journal of Economics Library, KSP Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 194-205, June.
    20. Bahoo, Salman & Alon, Ilan & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2020. "Sovereign wealth funds: Past, present and future," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsmbr:71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.