IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cfswop/683.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Green Asset Ratio (GAR) - a new KPI for credit institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Brühl, Volker

Abstract

The financial sector plays an important role in financing the green transformation. Various regulatory initiatives in the EU aim to improve transparency in relation to the sustainability of financial products and the sustainability of economic activities of non-financial and financial undertakings. For credit institutions, the Green Asset Ratio (GAR) has been established by the European regulatory authorities as a KPI for measuring the proportion of Taxonomy-aligned on-balance-sheet exposure in relation to the total assets. The breakdown of the total GAR by type of counterparty, environmental objective and type of asset provides in-depth information about the sustainability profile of a credit institution. This information, which has not been available to date, may also initiate discussions between management and shareholders or other stakeholders regarding the future sustainability strategy of credit institutions. This paper provides an overview of the regulatory background and the method of calculating the GAR along different dimensions. Finally, the potential benefits and limitations of the GAR are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Brühl, Volker, 2023. "The Green Asset Ratio (GAR) - a new KPI for credit institutions," CFS Working Paper Series 683, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cfswop:683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/268384/1/1831056070.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romain Berrou & Nicola Ciampoli & Vladimiro Marini, 2019. "Defining Green Finance: Existing Standards and Main Challenges," Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance, in: Marco Migliorelli & Philippe Dessertine (ed.), The Rise of Green Finance in Europe, chapter 0, pages 31-51, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena P. Fedorova, 2020. "Role of the State in the Resolution of Green Finance Development Issues," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 37-51, August.
    2. Shangram Bahadur Shah & Jirakiattikul Sopin & Kua-Anan Techato & Bibek Kumar Mudbhari, 2023. "A Systematic Review on Nexus Between Green Finance and Climate Change: Evidence from China and India," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 599-613, July.
    3. Volker Brühl, 2023. "The Green Asset Ratio (GAR): a new key performance indicator for credit institutions," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(1), pages 57-83, March.
    4. Feng Cui & Chuanfeng Han & Pihui Liu & Minmin Teng, 2022. "Green Credit of China’s Coal Power Enterprises during Green Transformation: A Tripartite Evolutionary Game Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Goshu Desalegn & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Anita Tangl, 2022. "The Effect of Monetary Policy and Private Investment on Green Finance: Evidence from Hungary," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Di Chen & Haiqing Hu & Chun‐Ping Chang, 2023. "Green finance, environment regulation, and industrial green transformation for corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2166-2181, September.
    7. Ozili, Peterson Kitakogelu, 2022. "Green finance research around the world: a review of literature," MPRA Paper 114899, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Meihui Zhang & Chi Zhang & Fenghua Li & Ziyu Liu, 2022. "Green Finance as an Institutional Mechanism to Direct the Belt and Road Initiative towards Sustainability: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-31, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cfswop:683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifkcfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.