IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

FUZZY COMPARATIVE CONCORDANCE ANALYSIS. Proposal and evaluation by a case study


  • Antonio Morillas

    (Universidad de Málaga)

  • Bárbara Díaz

    (Universidad de Málaga)

  • Jesús González

    (Universidad de Málaga)


In this paper it is proposed a fuzzy multiple attribute analysis, that we have called comparative concordance, as a help instrument to the decision-making process in an environment of lack of precise information as it generally is the decision-making in regional planning. Through an application to the selection of proceeding programs of the Environmental Plan of Andalusia, 1995-2000, it will be compared to other methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Morillas & Bárbara Díaz & Jesús González, 2005. "FUZZY COMPARATIVE CONCORDANCE ANALYSIS. Proposal and evaluation by a case study," Urban/Regional 0512004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpur:0512004
    Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 16

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Bertrand Mareschal, 1989. "Aide à la décision multicritère: développements théoriques et appplications," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9329, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Korhonen, Pekka & Moskowitz, Herbert & Wallenius, Jyrki, 1992. "Multiple criteria decision support - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 361-375, December.
    3. Bertrand Mareschal & Jean Pierre Brans, 1992. "PROMETHEE V: MCDM problems with segmentation constraints," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9341, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    fuzzy sets; multiple attribute decision; environmental planning;

    JEL classification:

    • R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpur:0512004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.