IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpga/0405002.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Metabolism of Social System: N-Person Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Analysis In Random Boolean Network

Author

Listed:
  • Hokky Situngkir

    (Bandung Fe Institute)

  • Deni Khanafiah

    (Bandung Fe Institute)

Abstract

Random Boolean Network has been used to find out regulation patterns of genes in organism. This approach is very interesting to use in a game such as N-Person Prisoner’s Dilemma. Here we assume that agent’s action is influenced by input in the form of choices of cooperate or defect she accepted from other agent or group of agents in the system. Number of cooperators, pay-off value received by each agent, and average value of the group, are observed in every state, from initial state chosen until it reaches its state-cycle attractor. In simulation performed here, we gain information that a system with large number agents based on action on input K equals to two, will reach equilibrium and stable condition over strategies taken out by its agents faster than higher input, that is K equals to three. Equilibrium reached in longer interval, yet it is stable over strategies carried out by agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Hokky Situngkir & Deni Khanafiah, 2004. "Metabolism of Social System: N-Person Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Analysis In Random Boolean Network," Game Theory and Information 0405002, EconWPA.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpga:0405002
    Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/game/papers/0405/0405002.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wsi:acsxxx:v:05:y:2002:i:02n03:n:s0219525902000584 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    evolutionary game theory; N-Person Prisoner’s Dilemma; cooperation; social stability; Random Boolean Network; Transition Rule;

    JEL classification:

    • C7 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory
    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpga:0405002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA). General contact details of provider: http://econwpa.repec.org .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.