IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/nwuipr/97-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Differential Taxation of Nonprofits and the Commercialization of Nonprofit Revenues

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph J. Cordes
  • Burton A. Weisbrod

Abstract

The effects of the favorable tax treatment of nonprofit commercial activities are best understood in a framework which explicitly accounts for the interaction between differential taxation and the preferences of nonprofit executives who may be averse to commercial activity, donors whose giving may be sensitive to NPO commercial activity, and cost complementarities between NPO core activities and the secondary money raising efforts. Within this framework, differential taxation encourages NPOs to puruse commercial ventures they would otherwise avoid, by providing excess financial returns that NPOs can exploit because of their tax-exempt status. Empirical analysis using data from the 1992 SOI public use file of 990 returns indicates that the propensity of nonprofit organizations to undertake both tax-exempt and charitable activities depends on the nature of their primary mission-related output and size, on the relative importance of government vs. private contributions, and on the size of the excess return created by differential taxation of of nonprofit and for-profit business. The results also show that organizations that engage in taxable commercial activities are also more liklely to allocate joint costs in ways that reduce their taxable income.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph J. Cordes & Burton A. Weisbrod, "undated". "Differential Taxation of Nonprofits and the Commercialization of Nonprofit Revenues," IPR working papers 97-15, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:97-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James R. Hines Jr., 1999. "Non-Profit Business Activity and the Unrelated Business Income Tax," NBER Chapters, in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 13, pages 57-84, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Marc Jegers, 2010. "The effect of board‐manager agency conflicts on non‐profit organisations’ earnings and cost allocation manipulations," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 407-419.
    3. Almond, Douglas & Xia, Xing, 2017. "Do nonprofits manipulate investment returns?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 62-66.
    4. Maxim Sinitsyn & Burton A. Weisbrod, 2008. "Behavior of Nonprofit Organizations in For-Profit Markets: The Curious Case of Unprofitable Revenue-Raising Activities," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 164(4), pages 727-750, December.
    5. James Alm & Daniel Teles, 2018. "State and federal tax policy toward nonprofit organizations," Chapters, in: Bruce A. Seaman & Dennis R. Young (ed.), Handbook of Research on Nonprofit Economics and Management, chapter 19, pages 370-385, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. C. Du Bois & R. Caers & M. Jegers & C. Schepers & S. De Gieter & R. Pepermans, 2004. "Agency problems and unrelated business income of non-profit organizations: an empirical analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(20), pages 2317-2326.
    7. Okten, Cagla & Weisbrod, Burton A., 2000. "Determinants of donations in private nonprofit markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 255-272, February.
    8. Marianne F. Johnson, 2003. "Differential Taxation of for-Profit and Nonprofit Firms: A Computational General Equilibrium Approach," Public Finance Review, , vol. 31(6), pages 623-647, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:97-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.