IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa10p1619.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Conceptualizing Social Capital in the Context of Housing and Neighbourhood Management

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Lang
  • Dietmar Roessl

Abstract

This paper provides a systematic literature overview of existing research on social capital in relation to housing and neighbourhood management. A growing body of research documents the significance of social capital for the social cohesion and well-being of neighbourhoods. Thus, in recent years, social capital has become a key concept for both, practitioners and academics dealing with issues of housing and neighbourhood management. However, as a result of its widespread use, social capital has also developed into a rather heuristic concept, generating controversy about its conceptualisation and measurement. Consequently, published articles show a high level of heterogeneity in their social capital approaches and thus, raise the demand for a review of current research in housing and neighbourhood management. Applying the method of systematic literature review, this article first identifies different schools of social capital research in the current research on housing and neighbourhood management. In a second step, theoretical as well as empirical contributions, within these research streams, are analysed and evaluated with regard to content and methodology. Finally, the paper aims to identify possible benefits and pitfalls of the different conceptualisations of social capital when studying housing areas and drawing implications for their management. Our findings highlight a lack of consensus on what social capital is, and how it should be defined in the context of housing and neighbourhood management. From the review, it is evident that researchers primarily focus on solidarity norms and patterns of social and political participation on the neighbourhood level, thus, treating social capital as a collective asset. However, extending the concept from its theoretical roots in social networks can lead to major conceptualisation and measurement problems. Thus, without clarifying the relationship between variables on the individual and collective level, the usefulness of social capital as an analytical concept for the study of housing areas is likely to be limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Lang & Dietmar Roessl, 2011. "Conceptualizing Social Capital in the Context of Housing and Neighbourhood Management," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1619, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p1619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa10/ERSA2010finalpaper1619.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Doling, 2006. "A European Housing Policy?," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 335-349.
    2. Ian Cole & David Etherington, 2005. "Neighbourhood Renewal Policy and Spatial Differentiation in Housing Markets: Recent Trends in England and Denmark," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 77-75, April.
    3. Susan S. Fainstein, 2001. "Competitiveness, Cohesion, and Governance: Their Implications for Social Justice," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 884-888, December.
    4. John Flint & Ade Kearns, 2006. "Housing, Neighbourhood Renewal and Social Capital: The Case of Registered Social Landlords in Scotland," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 31-54.
    5. Anders Munk, 2002. "Social Partnerships In Distressed Neighbourhoods: The Danish Case," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 223-244.
    6. Hugo Priemus, 2004. "Housing and New Urban Renewal: Current Policies in the Netherlands," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 229-246.
    7. Thomas Maloutas & Maro Pantelidou Malouta, 2004. "The glass menagerie of urban governance and social cohesion: concepts and stakes/concepts as stakes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 449-465, June.
    8. Ian Cole & David Etherington, 2005. "Neighbourhood Renewal Policy and Spatial Differentiation in Housing Markets: Recent Trends in England and Denmark," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 77-75.
    9. John Flint & Ade Kearns, 2006. "Housing, Neighbourhood Renewal and Social Capital: The Case of Registered Social Landlords in Scotland," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 31-54, April.
    10. John Doling, 2006. "A European Housing Policy?," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 335-349, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allan Cochrane & David Etherington, 2007. "Managing Local Labour Markets and Making up New Spaces of Welfare," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(12), pages 2958-2974, December.
    2. Machline E. & Pearlmutter D. & Schwartz M., 2022. "Social Mix Policies in the French Eco-Districts: Discourses, Policies and Social Impacts," Energy and Environment Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 1-36, June.
    3. Lang, Richard & Novy, Andreas, 2011. "Housing Cooperatives and Social Capital: The Case of Vienna," SRE-Discussion Papers 2011/02, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    4. Andreas Novy & Daniela Coimbra Swiatek & Frank Moulaert, 2012. "Social Cohesion: A Conceptual and Political Elucidation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1873-1889, July.
    5. Santiago Eizaguirre & Marc Pradel & Albert Terrones & Xavier Martinez-Celorrio & Marisol García, 2012. "Multilevel Governance and Social Cohesion: Bringing Back Conflict in Citizenship Practices," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1999-2016, July.
    6. Rasmus H Birk, 2017. "Infrastructuring the social: Local community work, urban policy and marginalized residential areas in Denmark," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 767-783, April.
    7. Ewa Kucharska-Stasiak & Sabina Źróbek & Konrad Żelazowski, 2021. "European Union Housing Policy—An Attempt to Synthesize the Actions Taken," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Reinout Kleinhans & Hugo Priemus & Godfried Engbersen, 2007. "Understanding Social Capital in Recently Restructured Urban Neighbourhoods: Two Case Studies in Rotterdam," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(5-6), pages 1069-1091, May.
    9. Michael Oxley & Marja Elsinga & Marietta Haffner & Harry Van Der Heijden, 2008. "Competition And Social Housing In Europe," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 31-36, June.
    10. Gössling, Stefan, 2016. "Urban transport justice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-9.
    11. Chau-kiu Cheung & Stephen Ma, 2011. "Coupling Social Solidarity and Social Harmony in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 145-167, August.
    12. Jonathan Pratschke & Enrica Morlicchio, 2012. "Social Polarisation, the Labour Market and Economic Restructuring in Europe: An Urban Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1891-1907, July.
    13. Marisol Garcia, 2006. "Citizenship Practices and Urban Governance in European Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(4), pages 745-765, April.
    14. John Harlow & Erik Johnston & Eric Hekler & Zoë Yeh, 2018. "Fostering Sustainability Transitions by Designing for the Convergence of Policy Windows and Transition Arenas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Frank Gaffikin & Mike Morrissey, 2011. "Community Cohesion and Social Inclusion," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(6), pages 1089-1118, May.
    16. Chau-kiu Cheung & Raymond Chan & Wing-chung Ho, 2014. "Feeling Close to Fellow Citizens in Hong Kong, Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 25-48, October.
    17. Robert Oxoby, 2009. "Understanding social inclusion, social cohesion, and social capital," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(12), pages 1133-1152, October.
    18. Ornella Mikuš & Marin Kukoč & Mateja Jež Rogelj, 2019. "The coherence of common policies of the EU in territorial cohesion: A never-ending discourse? A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(3), pages 143-149.
    19. Barbara Demeterova & Tatjana Fischer & Jürgen Schmude, 2020. "The Right to Not Catch Up—Transitioning European Territorial Cohesion towards Spatial Justice for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    20. Holtslag-Broekhof, Sanne, 2018. "Urban land readjustment: Necessary for effective urban renewal? Analysing the Dutch quest for new legislation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 821-828.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p1619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.