Foreign Direct Investment and the Catching-up Process in New EU Member States: Is There a Flying Geese Pattern?
The paper aims to verify the existence of the Flying Geese Model (FGM) in the case of inward FDI in Central European Countries (CECs) which are new EU member states; more precisely, to find out in what way and to what extent FDI has contributed to catching up, i.e. to the restructuring process and to productivity growth in CEC manufacturing. The analysis shows that FDI is an important if not the main vehicle of manufacturing sector restructuring and productivity growth in the analysed CECs, along the lines of FGM. In terms of technological intensity, foreign investment enterprises show better structure and faster and more promising restructuring trends than domestic enterprises. Restructuring processes in domestic enterprises are slower. Productivity growth in CEC manufacturing is positively correlated with technological intensity and the level of foreign penetration; the higher the technological level and the higher the foreign penetration, the higher the productivity growth. However, high foreign penetration has a negative impact on productivity growth in high- and medium-high-technology industries. The latter is in line with the criticism of the FGM, maintaining that catching-up via FDI along the lines of FGM is going on mostly in industries at the lower end of the technological intensity spectrum (i.e. at earlier stages of host country development) and less so when it comes to industries at the upper end of the technological intensity spectrum (i.e. at later stages of host country development). The FGM seems to have problems in explaining the catching-up process at more advanced stages of host country development. Also, new EU member states could not rely to a major extent on FDI when attempting to catch up in technologically advanced industries and/or in more advanced stages of development. There, endogenous efforts are indispensable.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
|Length:||48 pages including 17 Tables and 10 Figures|
|Date of creation:||Oct 2004|
|Publication status:||Published as wiiw Research Report|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Rahlgasse 3, A-1060 Vienna|
Phone: (+43-1) 533 66 10
Fax: (+43-1) 533 66 10-50
Web page: http://www.wiiw.ac.at
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://wiiw.ac.at|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wii:rpaper:rr:310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Customer service)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.