IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Allocation Mechanism Of Equalization Fund In Indonesia: Current Condition And Alternative Proposals Of Specific Grant In Sub National Level

Listed author(s):
  • Kodrat Wibowo


    (Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University)

  • Bagdja Muljarijadi


    (Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University)

  • Rullan Rinaldi


    (Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University)

As one of central government’s tools to equalize fiscal disparities between regions in Indonesia, current allocation mechanism of intergovernmental grant has been a major issue in regional public finance. Specifically, specific grant (DAK) was proven not much more specific than general block grant (DAU). Furthermore, the effectiveness of the specific grant allocation mechanism on poverty alleviation, economic growth, unemployment, and several others specific indicator has not met the desirable condition of the program’s outcome. This paper tries to propose alternatives on the allocation mechanism of specific grant that could effectively fulfill the objectives of affecting the local policy of poverty alleviation, economic growth, and unemployment. Employing sub national data at city and district level, we perform a simulation utilizing panel data regression of 458 cities/districts during period of 2001-2007. The result shows that existing DAK allocation on public investment program has not been able to meet development objectives in the long term economic development. Specifically, specific grant (DAK) was proven not much more specific than general block grant (DAU). This study also provides an efficiently simple, matching grant allocation mechanism which is conditional open-ended matching grants, along with intensive ongoing evaluation and monitoring to align the allocation of funds to regions with regional macroeconomic targets and promoting the level of community welfare; and at a certain level, using a bottom-up approach where the allocation of the fund should was based on local government interests and initiatives. The study consider that DAU per capita is a better main criteria for determining which areas are considered eligible as a recipient of DAK is districts that have a low fiscal capacity (general criteria). The simulation provides better estimation result than one from existing mechanism; the expected sign of DAK toward economic growth, poverty rate, and unemployment are in accordance with the theory and common knowledge. This brings consequences that DAK should be give to less region with higher amounts.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: First version, 2011
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University in its series Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) with number 201108.

in new window

Length: 53 pages
Date of creation: Sep 2011
Date of revision: Sep 2011
Handle: RePEc:unp:wpaper:201108
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Jalan Cimandiri No.6, Bandung 40115

Phone: (062)022-4204510
Fax: (062)022-4204510
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Anwar Shah & Zia Qureshi & Amaresh Bagchi & Brian Binder & Heng-fu Zou, 1994. "Intergovernmental fiscal relations in Indonesia: issues and reform options," CEMA Working Papers 474, China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unp:wpaper:201108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Arief Anshory Yusuf)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.