IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulp/sbbeta/2025-51.html

User Community Dynamics at a Large-Scale Research Infrastructure: Comparative Insights from Two Cases at the SOLEIL Synchrotron

Author

Listed:
  • Arman Avadykian
  • Kenza Bousedra
  • Sandrine Wolff

Abstract

This article analyzes the role of large-scale Research Infrastructures (RIs) in structuring the scientific landscape through the study of the dynamics of their academic user communities. We adopt a qualitative, meso-level approach to understand how an RI influences the emergence and evolution of scientific collectives. The study relies on a comparative analysis of two cases at the SOLEIL synchrotron facility: the biomedical sciences user community and the quantum materials user community. Drawing on a theoretical framework built from the literature on the social and scientific impacts of RIs, as well as on communities of practice and social networks, the analysis reveals two contrasted dynamics of community development. The biomedical community, which is emerging, is characterized by high heterogeneity, weak ties, and an individual mode of instrument appropriation that relies on boundary spanners to bridge the gap between the clinical world and the research infrastructure. In contrast, the quantum materials community, which is more mature, exhibits a collective mode of appropriation marked by strong ties, high visibility, and the integration of RI scientists as full scientific peers. These results highlight two distinct trajectories in the structuring of scientific communities around a large-scale instrument: the convergence of pre-existing disciplines on the one hand, and, on the other, the emergence of a new specialized branch within an established scientific community through the progressive specialization of some of its members.

Suggested Citation

  • Arman Avadykian & Kenza Bousedra & Sandrine Wolff, 2025. "User Community Dynamics at a Large-Scale Research Infrastructure: Comparative Insights from Two Cases at the SOLEIL Synchrotron," Working Papers of BETA 2025-51, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2025-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://beta.u-strasbg.fr/WP/2025/2025-51.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Heidler & Olof Hallonsten, 2015. "Qualifying the performance evaluation of Big Science beyond productivity, impact and costs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(1), pages 295-312, July.
    2. Isto Huvila & Theresa Dirndorfer Anderson & Eva Hourihan Jansen & Pam McKenzie & Adam Worrall, 2017. "Boundary objects in information science," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(8), pages 1807-1822, August.
    3. Massimo FLORIO & Emanuela SIRTORI, 2014. "The Evaluation of Research Infrastructures: a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework," Departmental Working Papers 2014-10, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Xiongfeng & Guo, Shucen & Li, Mengna & Song, Jinbo, 2021. "The effect of technology infrastructure investment on technological innovation ——A study based on spatial durbin model," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Xinzhe Li & Xiao Lu, 2025. "Analysis of the research collaboration organizational characteristics and scientific impact of large-scale research facilities: a case study of Chinese large-scale research facilities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2639-2671, May.
    3. Tilo Böhmann & Angela Roth & Gerhard Satzger & Carina Benz & Daniel Beverungen & Andreas Boes & Christoph Breidbach & Martin Gersch & Gerhard Gudergan & Jens Hogreve & Christian Kurtz & Barbara Langes, 2025. "Continuous value shaping: A boundary concept for innovating service innovation approaches," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Qiao, Lili & Mu, Rongping & Chen, Kaihua, 2016. "Scientific effects of large research infrastructures in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 102-112.
    5. repec:rnp:wpaper:2861 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Del Bo, Chiara F., 2016. "The rate of return to investment in R&D: The case of research infrastructures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 26-37.
    7. D’Ippolito, Beatrice & Rüling, Charles-Clemens, 2019. "Research collaboration in Large Scale Research Infrastructures: Collaboration types and policy implications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1282-1296.
    8. Chiara PANCOTTI & Giuseppe BATTISTONI & Mario GENCO & Maria Vittoria LIVRAGA & Paola MELLA & Sandro ROSSI & Silvia VIGNETTI, 2015. "The socio-economic impact of the National Hadrontherapy Centre for Cancer Treatment (CNAO): applying a CBA analytical framework," Departmental Working Papers 2015-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    9. Battistoni, Giuseppe & Genco, Mario & Marsilio, Marta & Pancotti, Chiara & Rossi, Sandro & Vignetti, Silvia, 2016. "Cost–benefit analysis of applied research infrastructure. Evidence from health care," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 79-91.
    10. Isto Huvila, 2022. "Making and taking information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 528-541, April.
    11. Mingze Zhang & Lili Wang & Zexia Li, 2025. "The impact of team compositions on disruptive and novel research in large-scale research infrastructures," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2987-3011, May.
    12. Wenchao Xu & Yanmei Xu & Junfeng Li, 2017. "A Study of RI Clusters Based on Symbiosis Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Ana Lara GÓMEZ, 2015. "Technological Spillovers of Research Infrastructures," Departmental Working Papers 2015-18, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    14. Xiyi Yang & Xiaoyu Zhou & Cong Cao, 2024. "Beamtimes and knowledge production times: how big-science research infrastructures shape nations’ domestic and international science production," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2025-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bestrfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.