IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i5d10.1007_s11192-025-05314-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the research collaboration organizational characteristics and scientific impact of large-scale research facilities: a case study of Chinese large-scale research facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Xinzhe Li

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Xiao Lu

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Large-scale research facilities (LSFs) play a crucial role in advancing fundamental scientific research and enhancing national innovation capacity. This study aims to analyze the organizational characteristics of collaboration within these facilities and their scientific impact. By collecting data on papers published between 2010 and 2023 from four typical LSFs of China, collaboration networks were constructed and compared with papers published in the same period not relying on these facilities. The results indicate that the collaboration network density of LSFs is significantly higher than that of ordinary scientific research networks, with a notably higher proportion of supporting members, reflecting a greater reliance on technical support and auxiliary work. There are also differences between different types of LSFs, with a complex non-linear relationship between the proportion of supporting members and research impact in public experimental platforms, and a significant positive linear relationship between this proportion and research impact in specialized research facilities. The effect of team size on scientific impact varies by facility type, with the number of authors having a significant effect on scientific impact in public experimental platforms and the number of institutions having a more significant positive effect on scientific impact in specialized research facilities. Additionally, the uneven distribution of degree centrality and betweenness centrality significantly affects scientific impact, but this effect varies by facility type. These findings highlight the need for differentiated and refined strategies in managing LSFs. Public experimental platforms should enhance support for core nodes and resource allocation, while specialized research facilities should focus on managing and optimizing the configuration of supporting members. This study provides empirical evidence for the management and resource allocation of LSFs, emphasizing the importance of flexible and refined management to fully harness their potential in driving scientific breakthroughs and technological innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinzhe Li & Xiao Lu, 2025. "Analysis of the research collaboration organizational characteristics and scientific impact of large-scale research facilities: a case study of Chinese large-scale research facilities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2639-2671, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05314-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05314-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05314-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05314-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05314-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.