IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-186034.html

Who benefits from energy policy incentives? The case of Jatropha adoption by smallholders in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Iria Soto
  • Wouter Achten
  • Bart Muys
  • E Mathijs

Abstract

Understanding the distribution of policy incentives is important in evaluating the impact of promotion programmes. This study investigates the allocation of economic subsidies to jatropha cultivation by using adoption models at both the community and household levels in Chiapas. At the community level, we compared socioeconomic and environmental variables of the communities that adopted jatropha to non-adopters. At the household level, 420 farm households were surveyed to analyse both the determinants of adoption and the extent of adoption (i.e. hectares dedicated to jatropha). The variables determining adoption were analysed at both levels using generalised linear models. The extent of jatropha adoption was assessed using ordinary least squares multiple regression. Quantitative data was complemented with key stakeholder interviews and focus groups. Results show that subsidies tend to be allocated to larger, better-connected communities which have access to better services. Within adopter communities, the subsidy is distributed among households that have more resources, better risk-coping strategies, better access to information, more experience with similar technologies and whose attitude towards risk is positive. This study provides lessons that can be useful for the introduction of new energy crops to better reach the target group and ultimately achieve the aims of energy promotion strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Iria Soto & Wouter Achten & Bart Muys & E Mathijs, 2015. "Who benefits from energy policy incentives? The case of Jatropha adoption by smallholders in Mexico," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/186034, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/186034
    Note: SCOPUS: ar.j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goswami, Kishor & Choudhury, Hari K., 2019. "Biofuels versus food: Understanding the trade-offs between climate friendly crop and food security," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 10-17.
    2. Dalemans, Floris & Muys, Bart & Verwimp, Anne & Van den Broeck, Goedele & Bohra, Babita & Sharma, Navin & Gowda, Balakrishna & Tollens, Eric & Maertens, Miet, 2018. "Redesigning oilseed tree biofuel systems in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 631-643.
    3. Hunsberger, Carol & German, Laura & Goetz, Ariane, 2017. "“Unbundling” the biofuel promise: Querying the ability of liquid biofuels to deliver on socio-economic policy expectations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 791-805.
    4. Fazal Um Min Allah, 2015. "Financial Analysis Of Using Jatropha Oil As Fuel In Diesel Engines," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0, pages 201-206, July.
    5. Dalemans, Floris & Muys, Bart & Maertens, Miet, 2019. "Adoption Constraints for Small-scale Agroforestry-based Biofuel Systems in India," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 27-39.
    6. Dalemans, F. & Muys, B. & Maertens, M., 2018. "Adoption of agroforestry-based biofuel systems in South India," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276990, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Marilyn A. Muñoz Mayorga & Eva Iglesias Martínez & Natalia Caldés Gómez, 2017. "Jatropha Suppliers as Contributors to the Sustainability of the Production of Bioelectricity in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/186034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.