IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uct/uconnp/2008-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing Input- and Output-Oriented Measures of Technical Efficiency to Determine Local Returns to Scale in DEA Models

Author

Listed:
  • Subhash C. Ray

    (University of Connecticut)

Abstract

This paper shows how one can infer the nature of local returns to scale at the input- or output-oriented efficient projection of a technically inefficient input-output bundle, when the input- and output-oriented measures of efficiency differ.

Suggested Citation

  • Subhash C. Ray, 2008. "Comparing Input- and Output-Oriented Measures of Technical Efficiency to Determine Local Returns to Scale in DEA Models," Working papers 2008-37, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:uct:uconnp:2008-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://media.economics.uconn.edu/working/2008-37.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Banker, Rajiv D., 1984. "Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 35-44, July.
    2. Banker, Rajiv D. & Cooper, William W. & Seiford, Lawrence M. & Thrall, Robert M. & Zhu, Joe, 2004. "Returns to scale in different DEA models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(2), pages 345-362, April.
    3. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cesaroni, Giovanni & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2017. "Global and local scale characteristics in convex and nonconvex nonparametric technologies: A first empirical exploration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 576-586.
    2. Zarepisheh, M. & Soleimani-damaneh, M., 2009. "A dual simplex-based method for determination of the right and left returns to scale in DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 585-591, April.
    3. Jean-Paul Chavas & Kwansoo Kim, 2015. "Nonparametric analysis of technology and productivity under non-convexity: a neighborhood-based approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 59-74, February.
    4. Sahoo, Biresh K & Khoveyni, Mohammad & Eslami, Robabeh & Chaudhury, Pradipta, 2016. "Returns to scale and most productive scale size in DEA with negative data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 545-558.
    5. A. Davoodi & M. Zarepisheh & H. Rezai, 2015. "The nearest MPSS pattern in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 163-176, March.
    6. Taleb, Mushtaq & Khalid, Ruzelan & Ramli, Razamin & Ghasemi, Mohammad Reza & Ignatius, Joshua, 2022. "An integrated bi-objective data envelopment analysis model for measuring returns to scale," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 967-979.
    7. Ferreira, Diogo Cunha & Nunes, Alexandre Morais & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2018. "Doctors, nurses, and the optimal scale size in the Portuguese public hospitals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(10), pages 1093-1100.
    8. Wang, Ying-Ming & Lan, Yi-Xin, 2013. "Estimating most productive scale size with double frontiers data envelopment analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 182-186.
    9. Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 2015. "Statistical Approaches for Non-parametric Frontier Models: A Guided Tour," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(1), pages 77-110, April.
    10. M Soleimani-damaneh, 2009. "A fast algorithm for determining some characteristics in DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(11), pages 1528-1534, November.
    11. Subhash C. Ray, 2014. "Data Envelopment Analysis: An Overview," Working papers 2014-33, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    12. Torben Schubert & Guoliang Yang, 2016. "Institutional change and the optimal size of universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1129-1153, September.
    13. Subhash C. Ray, 2010. "A One-Step Procedure for Returns to Scale Classification of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Working papers 2010-07, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    14. Anagnostopoulos, Yiannis & Husa, Kjetil A. & Noikokyris, Emmanouil, 2022. "A three-phase comparative efficiency analysis of US and EU banks," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 113-127.
    15. Zarepisheh, M. & Soleimani-damaneh, M., 2008. "Global variation of outputs with respect to the variation of inputs in performance analysis; generalized RTS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 786-800, April.
    16. Li Sun & Marty Stuebs, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Productivity: Evidence from the Chemical Industry in the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 251-263, December.
    17. Victor Podinovski, 2004. "Efficiency and Global Scale Characteristics on the “No Free Lunch” Assumption Only," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 227-257, November.
    18. Mostafa Omidi & Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh & Ali Payan & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, 2019. "Estimation of Overall Returns to Scale (RTS) of a Frontier Unit Using the Left and Right RTS," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 633-655, February.
    19. Kristof Witte & Rui Marques, 2011. "Big and beautiful? On non-parametrically measuring scale economies in non-convex technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 213-226, June.
    20. Mohammad Mahdi Mousavi & Jamal Ouenniche, 2018. "Multi-criteria ranking of corporate distress prediction models: empirical evaluation and methodological contributions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 853-886, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Most Productive Scale Size; Convex Technologies; Nonparametric Efficiency Analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D2 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations
    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uct:uconnp:2008-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark McConnel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuctus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.