IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Una valutazione delle carriere dei giovani lavoratori atipici: la fedeltàaziendale premia?

Listed author(s):
  • Canegallo, Claudia


Registered author(s):

    This paper confronts Greenwald's model of adverse selection in the labour market, with Topel and Ward's model of job shopping. According to Greenwald's contribution, in a sequence of periods, workers' freedom to change jobs is seriously reduced by a process of adverse selection. The labour market is characterized by imperfect information, which does not allow new potential employers to evaluate workers characteristics before employment, whereas current employers are better informed about the characteristics of their employees, and will concentrate their efforts in preventing turnover from the best workers, letting the worse ones free to move to other jobs. The pool of changers is thus characterized by workers of inferior quality, compared to the pool of stayers. Topel and Ward, on the other hand, show how young workers at the beginning of their career frequently move from one job to the other, to improve their job matching. According to this theory, through a process of intense job shopping young workers have more chances to improve their working conditions. The aim of this paper is to verify which of these two theories best applies to the Italian labour market. In particular, we want to asses which of these theories best describes the career paths of young temporary workers. As our data suggests, Topel and Ward's model seems to apply to young temporary workers, whereas Greenwald's model better describes the career paths of permanent workers.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS in its series POLIS Working Papers with number 20.

    in new window

    Length: 23 pages
    Date of creation: Jul 2001
    Handle: RePEc:uca:ucapdv:20
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uca:ucapdv:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lucia Padovani)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.