IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The Impact of Taxes and Social Spending on Inequality in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay: An Overview

  • Nora Lustig

    ()

    (Department of Economics, Tulane University)

  • Florencia Amabile

    ()

    (Economics Department, Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay)

  • Marisa Bucheli

    ()

    (Economics Department, Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay)

  • George Gray Molina

    ()

    (Chief Economist for UNDP-Latin America and the Caribbean, New York, New York)

  • Sean Higgins

    ()

    (Department of Economics, Tulane University)

  • Miguel Jaramillo

    ()

    (GRADE (Grupo de Análisis para el Desarrollo), Peru)

  • Wilson Jimenez Pozo
  • Veronica Paz Arauco

    ()

  • Claudiney Pereira

    ()

    (Department of Economics, Tulane University)

  • Carola Pessino

    ()

    (School of Government and Executive Director, Centro de Investigaciones y Evaluación en Economía Social para el Alivio de la Pobreza, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, Argentina)

  • Maximo Rossi

    ()

    (Economics Department, Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay)

  • John Scott

    ()

    (CIDE (Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas), Mexico and,Consejero Académico, CONEVAL (Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social), Mexico)

  • Ernesto Yanez Aguilar

    ()

How much redistribution and poverty reduction is being accomplished in Latin America through social spending, subsidies, and taxes? Standard fiscal incidence analyses applied to Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay using a comparable methodology yields the following results. Direct taxes and cash transfers reduce inequality and poverty by nontrivial amounts in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay but less so in Bolivia, Mexico, and Peru. While direct taxes are progressive, the redistributive impact is small because direct taxes as a share of GDP are generally low. Cash transfers are quite progressive in absolute terms, except in Bolivia where programs are not targeted to the poor. In Bolivia and Brazil, indirect taxes more than offset the poverty-reducing impact of cash transfers. When one includes the in-kind transfers in education and health, valued at government costs, they reduce inequality in all countries by considerably more than cash transfers, reflecting their relative size.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://econ.tulane.edu/RePEc/pdf/tul1316.pdf
File Function: First Version, April 2013
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Tulane University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 1316.

as
in new window

Length: 29 pages
Date of creation: Aug 2013
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:tul:wpaper:1316
Contact details of provider: Postal: 206 Tilton Hall, New Orleans, LA 70118
Phone: (504) 865-5321
Fax: (504) 865-5869
Web page: http://econ.tulane.edu

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tul:wpaper:1316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Finlay)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.