IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Selection and Imitation in Institutional Evolution: Analysis of Institutional Change in Japan, 1960-1999

Listed author(s):
  • Tetsuji Okazaki

    (Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo)

In this paper I applied the ideas of evolutionary biology and evolutionary ecology to the empirical analysis on the development of the institutions in postwar Japan. The basic question is how selection and imitation have worked in the evolution of the economic institutions in Japan. I focused on four factors of fitness, namely (i)growth rate, (ii)exit (death) rates, (iii)entry (birth) rate, and (iv)rate of the change of attribute. (i) and (ii) represent selection, while (iii) and (iv) represent imitation in the process of evolution. Constructing a data set on the population of the industrial firms, I examined how the composition of the population has changed over time with respect to institutional attributes, specifically main bank relationship, and to what extent the fitness factor (i)-(iv) contributed to that change. The major findings are as follows. First, in case we measure the pervasiveness of main bank relationship in terms of firm number, main bank system expanded until the 1970s and after that it contracted, while the share partially recovered in the 1990s. The fitness factors which have mainly contributed to the change of the composition of population are (iv)conversion rate and (iii) entry rate. While entry rate has continued to give a substantial negative effect of the share of the firms with main bank relationship, the change of the sign of the conversion effect between the 1970s and 1980s brought about the turning point of the main bank system from expanding phase to contracting phase. Second, in case we measure the pervasiveness of main bank relationship in terms of sales, main bank system started to contract earlier, in the 1970s. Growth rate as well as entry rate and conversion rate contributed to the change of the population. While the factor of growth rate had a positive effect in the 1960s, after that its effect has been negative, which brought about earlier decline of main bank system and its continuing decline in the 1990s. Next, I econometrically analyzed the effect of exit and growth rate factors on the evolution of main bank system, using sample selection model. I found that main bank relationship was basically neutral with respect to exit and growth until the 1980s, and that it had a negative effect on survival in the 1990s. Finally, I examined the institutional complementarity between main bank relationship and long term employment to find that in the 1960s those two institutions cooperatively worked on the firm growth. In this sense, main bank system and long term relationship were complementary and they co-evolved in this period. After that the co-evolution is not observed.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo in its series CIRJE F-Series with number CIRJE-F-227.

in new window

Length: 38 pages
Date of creation: Jun 2003
Handle: RePEc:tky:fseres:2003cf227
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033

Phone: +81-3-5841-5644
Fax: +81-3-5841-8294
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tky:fseres:2003cf227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CIRJE administrative office)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.