IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/thk/wpaper/114.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

WhoÕs Responsible Here? Establishing Legal Responsibility in the Fissured Workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Tanya Goldman

    (Center for Law and Social Policy)

  • David Weil

    (Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University)

Abstract

The nature of work is changing, with workers enduring increasingly precarious working conditions without any safety net. In response, this article proposes a new ÒConcentric Circle frameworkÓ which would improve workersÕ access to civil, labor, and employment rights. Many businesses, including app-based platforms, have restructured toward Òfissured workplaceÓ business models. They treat workers like employees (specifying behaviors and closely monitoring outcomes) but they classify workers as independent contractors (engaging them at an arms-length and cutting them off from rights and benefits tied to employment). These arrangements confound legal classifications of ÒemploymentÓ and expose deficiencies with existing workplace protections, which are based on Òemployment relationships.Ó As a result, a growing number of workers lack both bargaining power and critical workplace rights and benefits. We propose a Concentric Circle framework to better govern workersÕ rights in the modern era. At the core, we maintain that certain rights and protections should not be tethered to an employment relationship, but to work itself. Thus, the right to be compensated for work and paid a minimum wage; freedom from discrimination and retaliation; access to a safe working environment, and the right to associate and engage in concerted activity should belong to all workers, not just employees. Second, as a middle circle, we argue for a rebuttable presumption of employment to address those rights that remain exclusive to employees (and not independent contractors), and we propose an updated legal test of employment. Finally, at the outer ring of the framework, we suggest policies that could enhance workersÕ access to benefits that promote worker mobility and social welfare. Other scholarship has focused exclusively on either independent contractors or employees, or it has proposed a new category of worker altogether. We contend that this comprehensive framework better assigns rights, responsibilities, and protections in the modern workplace than do current legal doctrines or alternative proposals.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanya Goldman & David Weil, 2020. "WhoÕs Responsible Here? Establishing Legal Responsibility in the Fissured Workplace," Working Papers Series 114, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
  • Handle: RePEc:thk:wpaper:114
    DOI: 10.36687/inetwp114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.36687/inetwp114
    File Function: First version, 2020
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36687/inetwp114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janice Fine & Michael Piore, 2021. "Introduction to a Special Issue on the New Labor Federalism," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(5), pages 1085-1102, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Employment; independent contractor; employee classification; fissured workplace;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J8 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards
    • J38 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Public Policy
    • J58 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Public Policy
    • J78 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Public Policy (including comparable worth)

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:thk:wpaper:114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pia Malaney (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inetnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.