IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The impact of GSP Preferences on Developing Countries' Exports in the European Union: Bilateral Gravity Modelling at the Product Level

Listed author(s):
  • Xavier Cirera

    (IDS and CARIS, University of Sussex)

  • Francesca Foliano

    (Institute of Education, University College London)

  • Michael Gasiorek

    (Department of Economics and CARIS, University of Sussex)

Unilateral preferences aim at increasing exports from developing countries via reductions on applied tariffs and the incentives created by the preference margin. After decades of existence of these schemes, an important policy question is whether preferential schemes have been effective in increasing exports. This paper evaluates empirically the impact of the European Union (EU) GSP preferential regimes on exports from developing countries using a bilateral gravity model at the product level. Rather than using dummy variables to proxy each trade regime as in most empirical papers, this paper uses a unique dataset at CN-10 digits that allows us to determine the tariff rate paid by each export to the EU and the preferential regime of entry and address the issue of utilisation and nonutilisation of trade preferences, which can result in wrong attribution of causality between trade regimes and export flows. The most important finding of the paper is the fact that the results critically depend on (i) how the advantage provided by the preferences measure is measured, and (ii) whether the extensive margin of trade is included. Overall the results suggest preferences have a very small impact on trade, and negligible or even negative when we consider the scope for trade diversification. Therefore, it appears that the GSP system has provided a small effect on increasing exports at the intensive margin, but no effect on export diversification.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Department of Economics, University of Sussex in its series Working Paper Series with number 2711.

in new window

Date of creation: Oct 2011
Handle: RePEc:sus:susewp:2711
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Jubilee Building G08, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9SL

Phone: +44 (0) 1273 678889
Fax: +44 (0)1273 873715
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sus:susewp:2711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Russell Eke)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.