IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Underutilisation of Labour in (Continental Western) Europe: A Detailed GDP Accounting Perspective

  • Gilles Mourre

The paper decomposes GDP both in terms of level per capita and growth rate, so as to identify the extent of labour utilisation in Europe and its effect on income differences and economic growth in all EU27 countries. While some caveats are associated with this approach, GDP is broken down into 5 items (per capita GDP level) and 12 (GDP growth), decomposing labour inputs thoroughly and including a partial but comparable indicator of labour quality, based on the employment composition by educational attainment. The level of labour utilisation in the EU, defined as hours worked per capita, is clearly lower than that seen in the US and the 5 richest EU countries. The labour underutilisation accounts for two thirds of the per capita GDP gap in the EU15 vis-à-vis the US (17 p.p. out of 26%). The underutilisation of labour is much lower in the New Member States, being only 9% below the US level and is even above that in the five richest EU Member States. While the combination of lower labour utilisation and lower per-hour productivity is the cause of relatively low per capita GDP in euro area and EU15 countries, weak hourly productivity is the main concern in the New Member States. Over the last ten years (1995-2006), the growth in labour input (i.e. total hours worked) was the driving force behind one third of GDP growth in the EU15, while labour input growth only explained a very modest part of the buoyant GDP growth in the New Member States.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/54341/1/RePEc_sol_wpaper_09-050.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles in its series Working Papers CEB with number 09-050.RS.

as
in new window

Length: 59 p.
Date of creation: 2009
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published by:
Handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:09-050
Contact details of provider: Postal: CP114/03, 42 avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 1050 Bruxelles
Phone: +32 (0)2 650.48.64
Fax: +32 (0)2 650.41.88
Web page: http://difusion.ulb.ac.be
Email:


More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:09-050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Benoit Pauwels)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.