IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sol/wpaper/07-036.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The role of emotion in strategic issue interpretation: the case of diversity

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Garcia-Prieto Sol
  • Véronique Tran
  • Susan Schneider

Abstract

Strategic issues have the potential to impact organizational performance. These issues are subject to cognitive interpretation by decision-makers and implementers. Some strategic issues are considered to be “hot” because of their potential to evoke strong emotions. In this paper, we argue that the cognitive antecedents involved in strategic issue interpretation are similar to those involved in the determination of emotion. We use “diversity” as an example of strategic issue. We propose that individuals’ salient social identities will shape cognitive antecedents in turn eliciting specific emotions and associated behavioral tendencies. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Garcia-Prieto Sol & Véronique Tran & Susan Schneider, 2007. "The role of emotion in strategic issue interpretation: the case of diversity," Working Papers CEB 07-036.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:07-036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/14593/1/rou-0205.pdf
    File Function: rou-0205
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julio Suárez-Albanchez & Pedro Jimenez-Estevez & Juan Jose Blazquez-Resino & Santiago Gutierrez-Broncano, 2022. "Team Autonomy and Organizational Support, Well-Being, and Work Engagement in the Spain Computer Consultancy Industry: The Mediating Effect of Emotional Intelligence," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Ayşe Günsel & Atif Açikgöz, 2013. "The Effects of Team Flexibility and Emotional Intelligence on Software Development Performance," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 359-377, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:07-036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cebulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.