IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sec/cnstan/0240.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Financing of Georgian Education

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Herczynski

Abstract

We analyze Georgian education finance and show that it is embedded in the overall structure of Georgian rayon finances, reflecting all their weaknesses: inequalities, lack of transparency, unmanageability, room for corruption. The budgetary and political independence of rayons is very limited. The steep fiscal inequalities between rayons are only partially and ineffectively addressed by the system of transfers. The transfers moreover are heavily negotiated and non-transparent. Thus education finances depend on general income of the rayons, which effectively determines the level of financing. At the same time, however, the role of the rayons in the management of the sector is very limited. The actual spending patterns for Georgian general education schools are very closely related to per capita income of the rayons without the transfers (about 75% of education spending), and to student teacher ratio (about 25% of education spending). The dependence of the education system on rayon wealth is our main empirical finding, and it contradicts widespread belief among Georgian education professionals. It is not surprising therefore that the education sector in poorer and in mountainous rayons with very low student teacher ratio has to adapt to this situation. It responds by reducing the number of teachers per class, thus lowering standards of service delivery despite high per student costs. The first step required to change this situation is to increase budgetary independence and education management role of rayons. Without strong local governments it will not be possible to decentralize Georgian education. Moreover the influence of fiscal inequalities on education finance should be broken by taking it out of general rayon income and by basing it on a per student education grant to rayons (education subvention). This would lead to significant redistribution of public funds in Georgia. Such a move needs to be carefully prepared. It is necessary to subject education subvention to buffer mechanisms, in order to protect rayons from drastic changes to their present education spending patterns. Moreover, Georgia should begin thinking about a per student formula for education subvention, which recognizes unavoidable higher per student costs of providing education in different geographical and social settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Herczynski, 2002. "The Financing of Georgian Education," CASE Network Studies and Analyses 0240, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:sec:cnstan:0240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://case-research.eu/upload/publikacja_plik/sa240.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Undp,, 2000. "China Human Development Report 1999: Transition and the State," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195925869.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gasper, D.R., 2007. "Problem- and policy-analysis for human development," ISS Working Papers - General Series 18743, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    2. Vani K. Borooah & Paddy Hillyard & Mike Tomlinson, 2006. "Equity‐Sensitive Indicators Of Living Standards With An Application To Northern Ireland," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 53(5), pages 616-635, November.
    3. Matthias BUSSE & Sebastian BRAUN, 2003. "Trade and investment effects of forced labour: An empirical assessment," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 142(1), pages 49-71, March.
    4. Zhang, Xiaobo & Kanbur, Ravi, 2005. "Spatial inequality in education and health care in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 189-204.
    5. Rashida Haq & Mohammad Ali Bhatti, 2001. "Estimating Poverty in Pakistan The Non-food Consumption Share Approach," PIDE-Working Papers 2001:183, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    6. Tony Addison & Léonce Ndikumana, 2001. "Overcoming the Fiscal Crisis of the African State," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2001-12, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Heeks, Richard & Duncombe, Richard, 2003. "Ethical Trade: Issues in the Regulation of Global Supply Chains," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30674, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    8. Kitty Stewart, 2002. "Measuring Well-Being and Exclusion in Europe s Regions," LIS Working papers 303, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    9. Rosanna Nitti & Bharat Dahiya, 2004. "Community Driven Development in Urban Upgrading," World Bank Publications - Reports 11263, The World Bank Group.
    10. Steven Carter & Wilton Wilton, 2006. "Don'T Blame The Entrepreneur, Blame Government: The Centrality Of The Government In Enterprise Development; Lessons From Enterprise Failure In Zimbabwe," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(01), pages 65-84.
    11. Ineke Maas & Pamala Wiepking, 2004. "Gender Differences in Poverty: A Cross-National Research," LIS Working papers 389, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    12. Anthony P. D'Costa, 2004. "Globalization, Development, and Mobility of Technical Talent: India and Japan in Comparative Perspectives," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2004-62, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Dharam GHAI, 2003. "Decent work: Concept and indicators," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 142(2), pages 113-145, June.
    14. Duncan CAMPBELL, 2001. "Can the digital divide be contained?," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 140(2), pages 119-141, June.
    15. Gasper, D.R. & Truong, T.-D., 2008. "Development ethics through the lenses of caring, gender, and human security," ISS Working Papers - General Series 18734, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    16. Chaudhri, D.P. & Wilson, E.J., 2000. "Agricultural Growth, Employment and Poverty: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations with Indian data (1970-1993)," Economics Working Papers wp00-06, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    17. repec:wyi:journl:002079 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Zheng, Xinye & Wang, Jing & Li, Xilu & Yu, Yihua, 2013. "On the supply of China's healthcare resources in a decentralized healthcare system," MPRA Paper 56030, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sec:cnstan:0240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Budzynska (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caseepl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.