IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/saw/wpaper/wp-23-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The 66/77 products inside out: The long and short of the United States’ Nepal Trade Preference Programme

Author

Listed:
  • Paras Kharel

    (South Asia Watch on Trade, Economics and Environment)

Abstract

This paper contributes to the limited literature on the effects of unilateral trade preferences on exports by assessing the effect of a unilateral duty-free market access scheme offered by the United States to Nepal, a landlocked least developed country, for a 10-year period. Launched in 2016 to support Nepal in the wake of the devastating earthquake of the previous year and having obtained a waiver from a non-discrimination requirement at the World Trade Organization, the Nepal Trade Preference Programme(NTPP) provides duty-free access on 66 products (later converted into 77 products after a change in the tariff classification system) from Nepal. We find that there are overlaps in the product coverage of the NTPP and the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), the latter applicable to a broader group of developing countries. In 2021, some 21 percent of Nepal’s exports to the US (in value terms) were potentially eligible for GSP only, 5 percent for NTPP only and 3 percent for both. Preference utilization was lower among NTPP products than GSP products. Employing difference-in-differences and triple-difference estimations on detailed product-level data, we do not find conclusive evidence that the introduction of the NTPP led to an increase in Nepal’s exports of the products the scheme granted duty-free market access to.

Suggested Citation

  • Paras Kharel, 2023. "The 66/77 products inside out: The long and short of the United States’ Nepal Trade Preference Programme," Working Papers wp/23/01, South Asia Watch on Trade, Economics and Environment.
    • Handle: RePEc:saw:wpaper:wp/23/01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sawtee.org/publications/WP23_Nepal-US_trade_PKharel_WP.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ito, Tadashi & Aoyagi, Takahide, 2019. "Did the least developed countries benefit from duty-free quota-free access to the Japanese market?," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 32-39.
    2. Garth Frazer & Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2010. "Trade Growth under the African Growth and Opportunity Act," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 92(1), pages 128-144, February.
    3. Coniglio, Nicola D. & Vurchio, Davide & Cantore, Nicola & Clara, Michele, 2021. "On the evolution of comparative advantage: Path-dependent versus path-defying changes," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. C. A. Hidalgo & B. Klinger & A. -L. Barabasi & R. Hausmann, 2007. "The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations," Papers 0708.2090, arXiv.org.
    5. Sergio Correia & Paulo Guimarães & Tom Zylkin, 2020. "Fast Poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 20(1), pages 95-115, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sèna Kimm Gnangnon, 2023. "Do unilateral trade preferences help reduce poverty in beneficiary countries?," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 249-288, February.
    2. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2021. "Do Unilateral Trade Preferences Help Reduce Poverty in Beneficiary Countries?," EconStor Preprints 247346, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    3. Nomaler, Önder & Verspagen, Bart, 2022. "Some new views on product space and related diversification," MERIT Working Papers 2022-011, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. Nomaler, Önder & Verspagen, Bart, 2024. "Related or unrelated diversification: What is smart specialization?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 503-515.
    5. Kazunobu Hayakawa & Kenta Yamanouchi, 2024. "How does the reform of rules of origin affect firm performance in importing countries?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 837-856, February.
    6. Kazunobu Hayakawa, 2023. "Multiple preference regimes and rules of origin," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 159(3), pages 673-696, August.
    7. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm & Iyer, Harish, 2021. "Effect of Aid for Trade and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows on the Utilization of Unilateral Trade Preferences offered by the QUAD countries," EconStor Preprints 238211, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Cieślik, Andrzej & Parteka, Aleksandra, 2021. "Relative Productivity, Country Size and Export Diversification," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 28-44.
    9. Felipe, Jesus & Jin, Hongyuan & Mehta, Aashish, 2024. "Education and the evolution of comparative advantage," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 530-543.
    10. Kiyoyasu Tanaka, 2022. "The European Union's withdrawal of trade preferences for Cambodia," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(11), pages 3398-3419, November.
    11. Ricardo Hausmann & Muhammed A. Yildirim & Christian Chacua & Matte Hartog & Shreyas Gadgin Matha, 2024. "Global Trends in Innovation Patterns: A Complexity Approach," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 80, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    12. Flora Bellone & Cilem Selin Hazir & Toshiyuki Matsuura, 2020. "Adjusting to China Competition: Evidence from Japanese Plant-product-level Data," GREDEG Working Papers 2020-45, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    13. R. Boschma & Eduardo Hernández-Rodríguez & A. Morrison & C. Pietrobelli, 2021. "Do global value chains and local capabilities matter for economic complexity in EU regions?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2139, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Dec 2021.
    14. Khorana, Sangeeta & Caram, Santiago & Biagetti, Marco, 2021. "Developmental relevance of Everything but Arms: Implications for Bangladesh after LDC graduation," MPRA Paper 116258, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. John-Erik Rørheim & Ron Boschma, 2022. "Skill-relatedness and employment growth of firms in times of prosperity and crisis in an oil-dependent region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 676-692, June.
    16. Milene Tessarin & Deyu Li & Sergio Petralia & Ron Boschma, 2023. "The future geography of industries and occupations," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2302, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2023.
    17. Giorgi, Julien & Plunket, Anne & Starosta de Waldemar, Felipe, 2025. "Inter-regional highly skilled worker mobility and technological novelty," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    18. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2022. "Effect of the utilization of non-reciprocal trade preferences offered by the QUAD countries on beneficiary countries' economic complexity," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    19. Christian Chacua & Shreyas Gadgin Matha & Matte Hartog & Ricardo Hausmann & Muhammed A. Yildirim, 2024. "Global Trends in Innovation Patterns: A Complexity Approach," Growth Lab Working Papers 235, Harvard's Growth Lab.
    20. Di Ubaldo, Mattia & Borchert, Ingo, 2020. "Go ahead and trade: The effect of uncertainty removal in the EU’s GSP scheme," Papers WP691, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tariff; trade preferences; GSP; triple-difference estimation; export;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • O19 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:saw:wpaper:wp/23/01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ankur Singh (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sawtenp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.