IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/06-423.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mission Statement Perception: Are We All on the Same Wavelength? A Case Study in a Flemish Hospital

Author

Listed:
  • S. DESMIDT

    ()

  • A. HEENE

    ()

Abstract

Background Although it is widely recognized that the effectiveness of mission statements is contingent upon the extent to which they are communicated to the organization’s members, there is virtually no literature about how individual organizational members perceive the mission statement. Previous empirical mission statement research has tended to focus primarily on (a) analyzing mission statement content and (b) the CEO’s perception of the mission statement. Purposes In order to address these shortcomings and to help health care managers to better understand and manage their mission statement, a research project was set up that sought (a) to assess how managers and non-managers perceive the mission statement, and (b) to determine if there is a perception gap between both groups. Methodology/Approach In total 102 nurses, nurse managers and senior managers of a 217-bed Belgian regional general hospital filled in a questionnaire, based on the Competing Values Framework for Managerial Communication, in order to assess their perception of the organizational mission statement. Findings There is a mission statement perception gap between managers and non-managers. The scores of the management group are in almost all cases significantly higher. These findings suggests that managers have a more outspoken and positive attitude towards the mission statement than non-management members. Practice Implications In order to optimize the impact of the mission statement, managers should measure the perception of the mission statement and try to remediate possible mission statement 3 perception gaps. The Competing Values Framework for Managerial Communication is offered as a tool to assess (a) the presence, (b) the direction, and (c) the intensity of possible mission statement perception gaps.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Desmidt & A. Heene, 2006. "Mission Statement Perception: Are We All on the Same Wavelength? A Case Study in a Flemish Hospital," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/423, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:06/423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_06_423.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rik Pieters & Hans Baumgartner, 2002. "Who Talks to Whom? Intra- and Interdisciplinary Communication of Economics Journals," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 40(2), pages 483-509, June.
    2. Cote, Joseph A & Leong, Siew Meng & Cote, Jane, 1991. " Assessing the Influence of Journal of Consumer Research: A Citation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 402-410, December.
    3. Baumgartner, H. & Pieters, R., 2000. "The Influence of Marketing Journals : A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and its Sub-areas," Discussion Paper 2000-123, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    4. Muniz, Albert M, Jr & O'Guinn, Thomas C, 2001. " Brand Community," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 412-432, March.
    5. Hoffman, Donna L & Holbrook, Morris B, 1993. " The Intellectual Structure of Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Study of Author Cocitations in the First 15 Years of the Journal of Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 505-517, March.
    6. Pieters, R. & Baumgartner, H. & Vermunt, J.K. & Bijmolt, T.H.A., 1999. "Importance and similarity in the evolving citation network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing," Other publications TiSEM e2c16930-bf58-49ae-8cc9-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Ayres, Ian & Vars, Fredrick E, 2000. "Determinants of Citations to Articles in Elite Law Reviews," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(1), pages 427-450, January.
    8. Fournier, Susan, 1998. " Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 343-373, March.
    9. Cameron, A. Colin & Trivedi, Pravin K., 1990. "Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 347-364, December.
    10. John G. Lynch , Jr. & Dan Ariely, 2000. "Wine Online: Search Costs Affect Competition on Price, Quality, and Distribution," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 83-103, April.
    11. Leong, Siew Meng, 1989. " A Citation Analysis of the Journal of Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 492-497, March.
    12. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman & Yiu-Fai Yung, 2000. "Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 22-42, May.
    13. Hendrik P. van Dalen & Kene Henkens, 2000. "What makes a Scientific Article influential?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 00-032/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    14. Stefan Stremersch & Peter C. Verhoef, 2005. "Globalization of Authorship in the Marketing Discipline: Does It Help or Hinder the Field?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 585-594, February.
    15. repec:spr:scient:v:54:y:2002:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1016038617639 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. repec:spr:scient:v:50:y:2001:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1010510831718 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Kassarjian, Harold H, 1977. " Content Analysis in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 8-18, June.
    18. Scott Smart & Joel Waldfogel, 1996. "A Citation-Based Test for Discrimination at Economics and Finance Journals," NBER Working Papers 5460, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Mission statement; Perception; Competing Values Framework for Managerial Communication; Hospital; Nurses;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:06/423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nathalie Verhaeghe). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.