IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/ibrief/ib-24-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Policy Landscape for Agricultural Bioenergy

Author

Listed:
  • Joiner, Emily

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Toman, Michael A.

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Russo, Suzanne

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

Agricultural (ag) bioenergy has received financial and technical support from the Energy Title of the Farm Bill, first established in 2002. At present, however, the primary drivers of ag bioenergy are incentives in federal energy legislation (the Renewable Fuel Standard or RFS) and California legislation to reduce the greenhouse gas intensity of transportation fuels (the Low Carbon Fuel Standard or LCFS), along with policies administered by the US Environmental Protection Agency.The RFS creates requirements for incorporating various categories of renewable sources, including ag biofuels, into liquid transportation fuels. A complex credit program based on sales of qualifying renewable sources facilitates the achievement of those requirements. The thresholds for qualifying (20, 50, or 60 percent lower estimated lifecycle greenhouse gas intensity) are coarse-grained and thus coarsely targeted for providing incentives to reduce greenhouse gas intensity.The LCFS also uses a credit system to achieve targeted reductions in lifecycle greenhouse gas intensity over time. However, the emissions intensities of qualifying renewable sources are based on technology pathways, with careful assessments of actual emissions that provide incentives for reducing actual emissions intensity. Nevertheless, the measurement of reductions in emissions intensity is only as good as the baseline used for comparison—a concern that has been expressed over the calculation of negative emissions intensity for manure-derived biogas.There is vigorous debate about the overall reduction in greenhouse gases achieved with conventional bioethanol made from corn. Lower-carbon technologies remain costly to use at scale. Adverse environmental impacts also can arise from producing biofuels, some of which raise environmental justice concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Joiner, Emily & Toman, Michael A. & Russo, Suzanne, 2024. "The Policy Landscape for Agricultural Bioenergy," RFF Issue Briefs 24-03, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:ibrief:ib-24-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/4483/IB_24-03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. GianCarlo Moschini & Harvey Lapan & Hyunseok Kim, 2017. "The Renewable Fuel Standard in Competitive Equilibrium: Market and Welfare Effects," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1117-1142.
    2. Adjoyi, Gilbert & Kebede, Ellene, . "Landowners' Willingness to Supply Woody Biomass for Biofuel in West Alabama," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal (PAWJ), Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, vol. 5(01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christina Korting & Harry de Gorter & David R Just, 2019. "Who Will Pay for Increasing Biofuel Mandates? Incidence of the Renewable Fuel Standard Given a Binding Blend Wall," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(2), pages 492-506.
    2. Hyunseok Kim & GianCarlo Moschini, 2018. "The Dynamics of Supply: U.S. Corn and Soybeans in the Biofuel Era," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 94(4), pages 593-613.
    3. Aui, Alvina & Wang, Yu, 2022. "Post-RFS supports for cellulosic ethanol: Evaluation of economic and environmental impacts of alternative policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Johnson, David R. & Geldner, Nathan B. & Liu, Jing & Baldos, Uris Lantz & Hertel, Thomas, 2023. "Reducing US biofuels requirements mitigates short-term impacts of global population and income growth on agricultural environmental outcomes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Luo, Jinjing & Moschini, GianCarlo, 2019. "Pass-through of the policy-induced E85 subsidy: Insights from Hotelling's model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    6. Lijuan Yang, 2024. "The economics of standards: A literature review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 717-758, July.
    7. Iglesias Pinedo, Wilman J., 2021. "The impact of Renewable Energy Standards on the biomass supply and agricultural land demand in the US Great Plains Region," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 314085, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Kim, Hyunseok, 2019. "Assessing Alternative Renewable Energy Policies in Korea’s Electricity Market," KDI Journal of Economic Policy, Korea Development Institute (KDI), vol. 41(4), pages 67-99.
    9. Beaudoin, Justin & Chen, Yuan & Heres, David R. & Kheiravar, Khaled H. & Lade, Gabriel E. & Yi, Fujin & Zhang, Wei & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia, 2018. "Environmental Policies in the Transportation Sector: Taxes, Subsidies, Mandates, Restrictions, and Investment," ISU General Staff Papers 201808150700001050, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Gabriel E. Lade & C.-Y. Cynthia Lin Lawell, 2021. "The Design of Renewable Fuel Mandates and Cost Containment Mechanisms," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(2), pages 213-247, June.
    11. Nicholas J. Pates & Nathan P. Hendricks, 2021. "Fields from Afar: Evidence of Heterogeneity in United States Corn Rotational Response from Remote Sensing Data," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(5), pages 1759-1782, October.
    12. Gerveni, Maria & Serra, Teresa & Irwin, Scott H. & Hubbs, Todd, 2023. "Price connectedness in U.S. ethanol terminal markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    13. Clark Lundberg & Tristan Skolrud & Bahram Adrangi & Arjun Chatrath, 2021. "Oil Price Pass through to Agricultural Commodities†," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 721-742, March.
    14. Brinkman, Marnix L.J. & Wicke, Birka & Faaij, André P.C. & van der Hilst, Floor, 2019. "Projecting socio-economic impacts of bioenergy: Current status and limitations of ex-ante quantification methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:ibrief:ib-24-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.