IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rdg/repxwp/rep-wp2010-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Re-thinking Commercial Real Estate Market Segmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Franz Fuerst

    (School of Real Estate & Planning, University of Reading Business School)

  • Gianluca Marcato

    (School of Real Estate & Planning, University of Reading)

Abstract

Investments in direct real estate are inherently difficult to segment compared to other asset classes due to the complex and heterogeneous nature of the asset. The most common segmentation in real estate investment analysis relies on property sector and geographical region. In this paper, we compare the predictive power of existing industry classifications with a new type of segmentation using cluster analysis on a number of relevant property attributes including the equivalent yield and size of the property as well as information on lease terms, number of tenants and tenant concentration. The new segments are shown to be distinct and relatively stable over time. In a second stage of the analysis, we test whether the newly generated segments are able to better predict the resulting financial performance of the assets than the old dichotomous segments. Applying both discriminant and neural network analysis we find mixed evidence for this hypothesis. Overall, we conclude from our analysis that each of the two approaches to segmenting the market has its strengths and weaknesses so that both might be applied gainfully in real estate investment analysis and fund management.

Suggested Citation

  • Franz Fuerst & Gianluca Marcato, "undated". "Re-thinking Commercial Real Estate Market Segmentation," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2010-12, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
  • Handle: RePEc:rdg:repxwp:rep-wp2010-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.reading.ac.uk/rep/fulltxt/1210.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Devaney & Colin Lizieri, 2005. "Individual Assets, Market Structure and the Drivers of Return1," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 287-307, December.
    2. Martin Hoesli & Colin Lizieri & Bryan MacGregor, 1997. "The Spatial Dimensions of the Investment Performance of UK Commercial Property," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(9), pages 1475-1494, August.
    3. Gerald F. Blundell & Simon Fairchild & Robin N. Goodchild, 2005. "Managing Portfolio Risk in Real Estate," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2-3), pages 115-136, November.
    4. Stephen L. Lee, 2001. "The Relative Importance of Sector and Regional Factors in Real Estate Returns," ERES eres2001_206, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Andrew & Steven Devaney & Stephen Lee, 2003. "Another Look at the Relative Importance of Sectors and Regions in Determining Property Returns," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2003-14, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    2. Brett Robinson, 2012. "How many leases are enough to diversify a portfolio of multi-let industrial properties?," ERES eres2012_351, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    3. Cath Jackson & Allison Orr, 2011. "Real estate stock selection and attribute preferences," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 317-339, April.
    4. Peter Byrne & Stephen Lee, 2007. "Spatial Concentration in Institutional Investment in the UK: Some comparisons between the Retail and Office Sectors," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2007-01, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    5. Steven Devaney & Colin Lizieri, 2005. "Individual Assets, Market Structure and the Drivers of Return1," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 287-307, December.
    6. Catherine Jackson, 2002. "Classifying Local Retail Property Markets on the Basis of Rental Growth Rates," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1417-1438, July.
    7. David C. Wheeler & Antonio Páez & Jamie Spinney & Lance A. Waller, 2014. "A Bayesian approach to hedonic price analysis," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 663-683, August.
    8. David Gray, 2014. "Central European foreign exchange markets: a cross-spectral analysis of the 2007 financial crisis," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 550-567, June.
    9. Catherine Jackson, 2001. "A Model of Spatial Patterns across Local Retail Property Markets in Great Britain," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(9), pages 1445-1471, August.
    10. Simon Guy & John Henneberry & Steven Rowley, 2002. "Development Cultures and Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(7), pages 1181-1196, June.
    11. Foort Hamelink & Martin Hoesli & Colin Lizieri & Bryan D MacGregor, 2000. "Homogeneous Commercial Property Market Groupings and Portfolio Construction in the United Kingdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(2), pages 323-344, February.
    12. Marisa Gigante, 2012. "The incidence of real estate portfolio composition choices on funds performance: Evicence from the Italian market," ERES eres2012_186, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    13. Andrew Baum & Nick Colley, 2017. "Can Real Estate Investors Avoid Specific Risk?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 53(3), pages 395-430, September.
    14. Peter Byrne, 2005. "A Geography of the UK Commercial Property Market," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2005-17, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    15. Martin Greiner & Matthias Thomas, 2014. "Continuity of the valuation of property portfolios with stratified sampling: a case study," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 154-179, June.
    16. Maria Rosa Trovato & Claudia Clienti & Salvatore Giuffrida, 2020. "People and the City: Urban Fragility and the Real Estate-Scape in a Neighborhood of Catania, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-37, July.
    17. Carsten Lausberg & Stephen Lee & Moritz Müller & Cay Oertel & Tobias Schultheiß, 2020. "Risk measures for direct real estate investments with non-normal or unknown return distributions," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 6(1), pages 3-27, April.
    18. Stanimira Milcheva & Bing Zhu, 2018. "Asset pricing, spatial linkages and contagion in real estate stocks," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 271-295, October.
    19. Peter Byrne & Stephen Lee, 2006. "Geographical Concentration in the Institutional Market for Office Property in England and Wales," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2006-07, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    20. Michael Ball, 2002. "Cultural Explanation of Regional Property Markets: A Critique," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1453-1469, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    market segmentation; commercial real estate; financial performance measurement; cluster analysis; neural network analysis; risk diversification;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • D4 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • R33 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - Nonagricultural and Nonresidential Real Estate Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rdg:repxwp:rep-wp2010-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marie Pearson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bsrdguk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.