Performance budgeting: selected international experiences and some lessons for Slovenia
The paper’s main purpose is to briefly discuss the concept of performance budgeting and challenges encountered by different (OECD) countries when seeking to implement performance budgeting, which might offer some helpful guidelines for Slovenia. The paper also presents the methodological framework applied in defining goals in a society as well as the role and the interdependence of social indicators and performance indicators for specific units/programs in public administration. Theoretical bases of such procedures will be presented along with an empirical concept which is believed to be appropriate for Slovenia. The formulation of the concept stems from the definitions given in the Budget Manual for 2008-2009 where individual budget users are responsible for monitoring their performance and efficiency. On this basis, we developed a theoretical concept of connections between different levels of long-term goals, implementational goals as well as efficiency and effectiveness indicators at the level of sub-programs of selected budget users. A theoretical and methodological framework constructed in this way will hopefully serve as the basis for realizing the concept of Slovenian direct performance budgeting in the near future.
|Date of creation:||31 May 2009|
|Publication status:||Published in Journal of Economics 3.58(2010): pp. 271-291|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany|
Web page: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Andrea Saltelli, 2007. "Composite Indicators between Analysis and Advocacy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 65-77, March.
- Bram Scheers & Miekatrien Sterck & Geert Bouckaert, 2006. "Lessons from Australian and British Reforms in Results oriented Financial Management," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 133-162.
- Teresa Curristine, 2003. "Performance Information in the Budget Process: Results of the OECD 2005 Questionnaire," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 87-131.
- Frans K. M. van Nispen & Johan J. A. Posseth, 2007. "Performance Budgeting in the Netherlands: Beyond Arithmetic," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 6(4), pages 37-62.
- Jón R. Blöndal & Dirk-Jan Kraan & Michael Ruffner, 2003. "Budgeting in the United States," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 7-53.
- Abbott Ferriss, 2002. "TELESIS: The Uses of Indicators to Set Goals and Develop Programs to Change Conditions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 229-265, June.
- Allen Schick, 2003. "The Performing State: Reflection on an Idea Whose Time Has Come but Whose Implementation Has Not," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 71-103.
- Jón R. Blöndal & Teresa Curristine, 2006. "Budgeting in Chile," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 7-45.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:15499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.