IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/121102.html

Australia’s artificial intelligence ecosystem: The second update

Author

Listed:
  • Hajkowicz, Stefan
  • Bratanova, Alexandra
  • Schleiger, Emma
  • Naughtin, Claire

Abstract

This is the second report about Australia’s AI ecosystem with the first being published last year in 2022 (NAIC, 2022). It has been commissioned by the National Artificial Intelligence Centre (NAIC) and delivered by a research team in CSIRO. Australia’s AI ecosystem is comprised of start-ups, small-to-large-sized companies, universities, research institutes, industry organisations and public sector agencies engaged in developing and applying AI technology. This report aims to provide a snapshot of the current state of Australia’s AI ecosystem and inform future strategy and policy decisions about its growth and development. This report contains information about companies, product innovation, investment, universities, research institutes and specialised capabilities relating to AI in Australia. It also contains information about the perceived challenges and opportunities for future growth and development of AI in Australia. The report aims to inform people in industry, academia, government and community spheres making decisions about AI capability uplift. This report is useful to anyone wanting to understand and develop AI capability in Australia. It could be used by investors looking for opportunities in the Australian marketplace. It could be used by a company wanting to train and recruit AI talent. It could be used by someone starting or developing an AI company. It could be used by universities and research institutes planning for AI capability development. It could be used by Local, State/Territory and Federal government agencies aiming to support the AI industry and job growth. And, it could be used by workers and students planning their AI careers.

Suggested Citation

  • Hajkowicz, Stefan & Bratanova, Alexandra & Schleiger, Emma & Naughtin, Claire, 2023. "Australia’s artificial intelligence ecosystem: The second update," MPRA Paper 121102, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:121102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/121102/1/MPRA_paper_121102.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bratanova, Alexandra & Pham, Hien & Mason, Claire & Hajkowicz, Stefan & Naughtin, Claire & Schleiger, Emma & Sanderson, Conrad & Chen, Caron & Karimi, Sarvnaz, 2022. "Differentiating artificial intelligence activity clusters in Australia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Andrew Crawley & Malcolm Beynon & Max Munday, 2013. "Making Location Quotients More Relevant as a Policy Aid in Regional Spatial Analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(9), pages 1854-1869, July.
    3. Erik Brynjolfsson & Danielle Li & Lindsey Raymond, 2025. "Generative AI at Work," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(2), pages 889-942.
    4. Arundel, Anthony & Kabla, Isabelle, 1998. "What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 127-141, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Collinson S. & Narula, R., 2014. "Asset recombination in international partnerships as a source of improved innovation capabilities in China," MERIT Working Papers 2014-061, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Crass, Dirk & Garcia Valero, Francisco & Pitton, Francesco & Rammer, Christian, 2016. "Protecting innovation through patents and trade secrets: Determinants and performance impacts for firms with a single innovation," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-061, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. Tom Broekel & Matthias Brachert & Matthias Duschl & Thomas Brenner, 2015. "Joint R and D subsidies, related variety, and regional innovation," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2015-01, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    4. Hwang, Hong & Peng, Cheng-Hau & Shih, Pei-Cyuan, 2014. "Parallel imports, product innovation and market structures," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 237-245.
    5. Abendroth Dias Kulani & Arias Patricia & Bacco F. Manlio & Bassani Elias & Bertoletti Alice & Bertolini Lorenzo & Bertrand Astrid & Bili Danai & Boucher Philip & Cachia Romina & Ceresa Mario & Chaslot, 2025. "Generative AI Outlook Report," JRC Research Reports JRC142598, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Rajeev K. Goel, 2023. "Seek foreign funds or technology? Relative impacts of different spillover modes on innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1466-1488, August.
    7. Zara Contractor & Germ'an Reyes, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," Papers 2508.00717, arXiv.org.
    8. Fontana, Roberto & Nuvolari, Alessandro & Shimizu, Hiroshi & Vezzulli, Andrea, 2013. "Reassessing patent propensity: Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards, 1977–2004," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 1780-1792.
    9. Christoph Riedl & Eric Bogert, 2024. "Effects of AI Feedback on Learning, the Skill Gap, and Intellectual Diversity," Papers 2409.18660, arXiv.org.
    10. Joo, Youngbin & Georgakakis, Dimitrios & Sidhu, Jatinder S., 2025. "CEO career horizon and innovation: A u-shaped tale of short-term profits and long-term legacy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).
    11. Sternitzke, Christian, 2013. "An exploratory analysis of patent fencing in pharmaceuticals: The case of PDE5 inhibitors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 542-551.
    12. Battke, Benedikt & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Stollenwerk, Stephan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Internal or external spillovers—Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-41.
    13. Horst Feldmann, 2013. "Technological unemployment in industrial countries," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1099-1126, November.
    14. Carvajal, Daniel & Franco, Catalina & Isaksson, Siri, 2024. "Will Artificial Intelligence Get in the Way of Achieving Gender Equality?," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 3/2024, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics, revised 28 Apr 2025.
    15. Riccardo Zanardelli, 2025. "Navigating the safe harbor paradox in human-machine systems," Papers 2509.14057, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    16. Barankay, Iwan & Contigiani, Andrea & Hsu, David, 2018. "Trade Secrets and Innovation: Evidence from the “Inevitable Disclosure†Doctrine," CEPR Discussion Papers 13077, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Hans Georg Helmstädter & Anna Gehlke & Lukasz Hill & Bernd Klöver & Laura Wallor & Christoph Badelt & Matthias Firgo & Oliver Fritz & Kathrin Hofmann & Mark Horridge & Jürgen Janger & Peter Mayerhofer, 2020. "Perspektiven der wissenschaftlichen Metropolregion Hamburg – Eine vergleichende Analyse. Anhänge," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 62513.
    18. Penin, Julien, 2005. "Patents versus ex post rewards: A new look," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 641-656, June.
    19. Sanghoon Ahn & Bronwyn H. Hall & Keun Lee (ed.), 2014. "Intellectual Property for Economic Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15464.
    20. Zou, Yuxiang & Chen, Tai-Liang, 2020. "Quality differentiation and product innovation licensing," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 372-382.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:121102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.