IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/waq2e.html

Living Labs, vacancy, and gentrification

Author

Listed:
  • Cardullo, Paolo

    (IN3)

  • Kitchin, Rob

    (National University of Ireland Maynooth)

Abstract

This paper evaluates smart city (SC) initiatives in the context of re-using vacant property. More specifically, we focus on living labs (LL) and vacancy in general, as well as on their potential role in fostering creative economy-fuelled gentrification. LL utilise Lo-Fi technologies to foster local digital innovation and support community-focused civic hacking, running various kinds of workshops and engaging with local citizens to co-create digital interventions and apps aimed at ‘solving’ local issues. Five approaches to LL are outlined and discussed in relation to vacancy and gentrification: pop-up initiatives, university-led activities, community organised venues/activities, citizen sensing and crowdsourcing, and tech-led regeneration initiatives. Notwithstanding the potential for generating temporary and independent spaces for transferring and fostering digital competences and increasing citizens’ participation in the SC, we argue that LL largely foster a form of participation framed within a model of civic stewardship for ‘smart citizens’. While presented as horizontal, open, and participative, LL and civic hacking are often rooted in pragmatic and paternalistic discourses and practices related to the production of a creative economy and a specific version of SC. As such, by encouraging a particular kind of re-use of vacant space, LL potentially contributes to gentrification pressures within locales by attracting the creative classes and new investment. We discuss these approaches and issues generally and with respect to examples in Dublin, Ireland.

Suggested Citation

  • Cardullo, Paolo & Kitchin, Rob, 2017. "Living Labs, vacancy, and gentrification," SocArXiv waq2e, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:waq2e
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/waq2e
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/58ca65556c613b01feed7f3b/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/waq2e?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Marcuse, 2014. "Reading the right to the city. Part two: Organisational realities," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 101-103, April.
    2. Alberto Vanolo, 2014. "Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(5), pages 883-898, April.
    3. Martin Dodge & Rob Kitchin, 2013. "Crowdsourced Cartography: Mapping Experience and Knowledge," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(1), pages 19-36, January.
    4. David Harvey, 2003. "The right to the city," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 939-941, December.
    5. Peter Marcuse, 2014. "Reading the Right to the City," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 4-9, February.
    6. Paolo Cardullo, 2017. "Gentrification in the mesh?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3-4), pages 405-419, July.
    7. Tom Slater, 2006. "The Eviction of Critical Perspectives from Gentrification Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 737-757, December.
    8. Paola Mengoli & Margherita Russo, 2017. "A hybrid space to support the regeneration of competences for re-industrialization. Lessons from a research-action," Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) 0150, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cardullo, Paolo & Kitchin, Rob, 2017. "Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: Up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation," SocArXiv v24jn, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:waq2e_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mikael Granberg & Leigh Glover, 2021. "The Climate Just City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Baumgartner, Annabell & Klinner, Nora & Lanzendorf, Martin, 2025. "Right to the city or right to park a car? Acceptability of parking management for a social-ecological transformation of urban neighbourhoods," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Cardullo, Paolo, 2018. "Commoning the smart city: A case for a public Internet provision," SocArXiv u8dk2, Center for Open Science.
    5. Sven Daniel Wolfe, 2023. "Building a better host city? Reforming and contesting the Olympics in Paris 2024," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(2), pages 257-273, March.
    6. Malecki, Edward J., 2017. "Real people, virtual places, and the spaces in between," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 3-12.
    7. Cardullo, Paolo & Kitchin, Rob, 2017. "Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: Up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation," SocArXiv v24jn, Center for Open Science.
    8. Jorge Inzulza-Contardo & Paulina Gatica-Araya, 2019. "Subsidiary displacement and empty plots: Dilemmas of original residents and newcomers in the reconstruction of Talca, Chile 2010–2016," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(10), pages 2040-2057, August.
    9. Minner, Jennifer S. & Zhou, Grace Yixian & Toy, Brian, 2022. "Global city patterns in the wake of World Expos: A typology and framework for equitable urban development post mega-event," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Fancello, Giovanna & Tsoukiàs, Alexis, 2021. "Learning urban capabilities from behaviours. A focus on visitors values for urban planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Jesús M. González-Pérez, 2022. "Evictions, Foreclosures, and Global Housing Speculation in Palma, Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-26, February.
    12. Coletta, Claudio & Heaphy, Liam & Kitchin, Rob, 2017. "From the accidental to articulated smart city: The creation and work of ‘Smart Dublin’," SocArXiv 93ga5, Center for Open Science.
    13. Lorenzo Chelleri & Harn Wei Kua & Juan Pablo Rodríguez Sánchez & Kh Md Nahiduzzaman & Gladman Thondhlana, 2016. "Are People Responsive to a More Sustainable, Decentralized, and User-Driven Management of Urban Metabolism?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-12, March.
    14. Gergely Olt & Borbála Simonovits & Anikó Bernát & Adrienne Csizmady, 2024. "Housing Commodification and Increasing Potential Ground Rents in Post‐Socialist Budapest," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 115(1), pages 126-141, February.
    15. Flurina M. Wartmann & Ross S. Purves, 2017. "What’s (Not) on the Map: Landscape Features from Participatory Sketch Mapping Differ from Local Categories Used in Language," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Marta Christina SUCIU & Adrian PETRE, 2019. "The Role of 5G Technology in Sustainable Development of Smart Cities," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 39-47.
    17. Kate Parizeau, 2017. "Witnessing urban change: Insights from informal recyclers in Vancouver, BC," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(8), pages 1921-1937, June.
    18. Heba Allah Essam E. Khalil & AbdelKhalek Ibrahim & Noheir Elgendy & Nahla Makhlouf, 2022. "Enhancing Livability in Informal Areas: A Participatory Approach to Improve Urban Microclimate in Outdoor Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Ruijie Zhang & Miquel Martí Casanovas & Montserrat Bosch González & Sijie Sun, 2025. "Public Value in Historic Environment Regeneration in China: A Public Perception Perspective on Spatial Form, Urban Governance, and People’s Experience (2000–2020)," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Matthias Bernt, 2012. "The ‘Double Movements’ of Neighbourhood Change: Gentrification and Public Policy in Harlem and Prenzlauer Berg," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3045-3062, November.
    21. Viktoria Jozsa & Jozsef Kaposzta & Henrietta Nagy, 2017. "Is Smartness The Privilege Of Cities? Pilot Development And Application In The Hungarian-Slovak Border Region," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 11(2), pages 12-26, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:waq2e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.