IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/uwtfv.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Methodological Individualism

Author

Listed:
  • Ylikoski, Petri

    (University of Helsinki)

Abstract

This paper reviews controversies about methodological individualism and aims to sort out various debates ,motivations, and claims involved in the debate. It suggests some reasons why it is do difficult to be precise about MI and describes the dialectics of the debate. The long and unresolved history of MI is mostly explained by the ambiguity of more basic notions involved in its for- mulation. Thus, people have very different views about the content of MI. Also the emphasis on individuals might be partly misleading, as the real issue for many individualists seems to be agency rather than individuality as such.

Suggested Citation

  • Ylikoski, Petri, 2017. "Methodological Individualism," SocArXiv uwtfv, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:uwtfv
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/uwtfv
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/596afb1c594d90022b7bd18e/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/uwtfv?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2007. "Meanings of methodological individualism," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 211-226.
    2. List, Christian & Spiekermann, Kai, 2013. "Methodological Individualism and Holism in Political Science: A Reconciliation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(4), pages 629-643, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heira Georgina Valdez-Bocanegra & Gonzalo Maldonado-Guzmán & Carmen Castrejón-Mata, 2020. "The Entrepreneurial Orientation and its Impact on Competitiveness and Growth: Empirical Evidence in the State of Aguascalientes in Mexico," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 1-6.
    2. Thiago Dumont Oliveira & Carlos Eduardo Suprinyak, 2016. "Lionel Robbins’ first-step individualism and the prehistory of microfoundations," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 537, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    3. Masahiko Aoki, 2013. "Institutions as cognitive media between strategic interactions and individual beliefs," Chapters, in: Comparative Institutional Analysis, chapter 17, pages 298-312, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Stephanie Collins, 2019. "Collective Responsibility Gaps," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 943-954, February.
    5. Chandra, Yanto & Wilkinson, Ian F., 2017. "Firm internationalization from a network-centric complex-systems perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 691-701.
    6. Thomas Grebel, 2011. "Innovation and Health," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14375.
    7. Nicolas Brisset, 2016. "Institutions as Emergent Phenomena: Redefining Downward Causation," Working Papers halshs-01425669, HAL.
    8. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2016. "Mentalism Versus Behaviourism In Economics: A Philosophy-Of-Science Perspective," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 249-281, July.
    9. Erik W. Matson, 2023. "Ethical Economics or Economical Ethics? Considerations out of Carl Menger," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 311-330, June.
    10. Casajus, André & Kramm, Michael & Wiese, Harald, 2020. "Asymptotic stability in the Lovász-Shapley replicator dynamic for cooperative games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    11. Giancarlo Ianulardo & Aldo Stella, 2022. "Towards a unity of sense: A critical analysis of the concept of relation in methodological individualism and holism in Economics," Working Papers hal-03771892, HAL.
    12. Johannes Urpelainen, 2011. "The origins of social institutions," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 23(2), pages 215-240, April.
    13. Ivaylo Donchev Beev, 2017. "Economic theory of constitution. English-American school," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 131-151.
    14. Delli Gatti,Domenico & Fagiolo,Giorgio & Gallegati,Mauro & Richiardi,Matteo & Russo,Alberto (ed.), 2018. "Agent-Based Models in Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108400046.
    15. Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "Теория Опекаемых Благ И Патернализм В Экономических Теориях: Общее И Особенное [The Theory of Patronized Goods and the Paternalism in Economic Theories: General and Special]," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2015:1, Institute of Economics.
    16. Damien Cahill, 2020. "Market analysis beyond market fetishism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 27-45, February.
    17. Miguel Alzola, 2023. "Conceptions of the Firm and Corporate Allegiances," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 201-216, August.
    18. Brendan Markey‐Towler, 2019. "The New Microeconomics: A Psychological, Institutional, and Evolutionary Paradigm with Neoclassical Economics as a Special Case," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(1), pages 95-135, January.
    19. Dieter Bögenhold, 2018. "Schumpeter’s Split Between “Pure” Economics and Institutional Economics: Why Methodological Individualism Was Not Fully Considered," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 24(3), pages 253-264, August.
    20. De Rosa, Marcello & Adinolfi, Felice & Capitanio, Fabian & Paci, Federica & Pantini, Denis, 2015. "The role of culinary programs in the emergency of "distinct" consumers," 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy 202734, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:uwtfv. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.