IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/h8acu_v1.html

Benchmarking of national policies for the prevention of noncommunicable diseases: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Seyfarth, Eva

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany)

  • Klinger, Carmen

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany)

  • von Philipsborn, Peter

    (University of Bayreuth)

Abstract

Introduction Each year, approximately 18 million people die prematurely from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) worldwide, many of which could be prevented through effective policies targeting modifiable risk factors. Despite strong evidence supporting the effectiveness of policies, major gaps remain in their adoption and implementation. Benchmarking national policies against international standards helps identify implementation gaps and opportunities for improvement. This study systematically reviewed existing benchmarking initiatives assessing and comparing national policies to reduce modifiable risk factors for NCDs. Methods We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the recommendations by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We applied a multi-stage search strategy, including a citation search based on literature known to the authors and identified through expert consultation (April-June 2025), a complementing AI-assisted search (July 2025), and a targeted search via PubMed (February 2026). Results A total of 243 full texts were screened, and 89 reports representing 16 benchmarking initiatives were included. Six initiatives assessed strategies to reduce harmful alcohol use, while three initiatives each focused on tobacco use, unhealthy diets, and physical inactivity. Only the World Health Organization’s NCD Progress Monitor addressed all four major risk factors. It comprises eleven indicators and is based on government self-reports supplemented by data from the World Health Organization. None of the identified initiatives enabled a comprehensive benchmarking and ranking of national strategies across all four major NCD risk factors based on objective data. Conclusions This scoping review provides a more nuanced understanding of current benchmarking efforts in NCD prevention and serves as a foundation for the development of a comprehensive, overarching NCD prevention index.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyfarth, Eva & Klinger, Carmen & von Philipsborn, Peter, 2026. "Benchmarking of national policies for the prevention of noncommunicable diseases: A Scoping Review," SocArXiv h8acu_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:h8acu_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/h8acu_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a69b97459d06d749a2f458a/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/h8acu_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald A Brand & Michaela Saisana & Lisa A Rynn & Fulvia Pennoni & Albert B Lowenfels, 2007. "Comparative Analysis of Alcohol Control Policies in 30 Countries," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-8, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seo, Seonwha & Chun, Sungsoo & Newell, Maxine & Yun, Mieun, 2015. "Korean public opinion on alcohol control policy: A cross-sectional International Alcohol Control study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 33-43.
    2. Saisana, Michaela & d'Hombres, Béatrice & Saltelli, Andrea, 2011. "Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 165-177, February.
    3. Gianni Onesti, 2020. "The Administrative Capacity of the Italian Regions from a Comparative Perspective," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 513-538.
    4. Kabir Dasgupta & Christopher Erwin & Alexander Plum, 2020. "The Devil is in the Details: Identifying the Unbiased Link between Access to Alcohol and Criminal Behavior," Working Papers 2020-12, Auckland University of Technology, Department of Economics.
    5. Hayat, Azmat & Mohd Shafiai, Dr Muhammad Hakimi & Latif Samian, Abdul, 2018. "Alcoholic Drinks and Public Interest in case of Noe-liberalism and Islam," MPRA Paper 85492, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Kozyk Vasyl & Vorobets Stepan & Musiiovska Oksana, 2019. "Research of the place of Ukraine in implementation of the goals of the sustainable development model," Technology audit and production reserves, 3(47) 2019, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 3(4(47)), pages 19-27.
    7. Eric L. Sevigny & Michaela Saisana, 2016. "Measuring Interstate Variations in the Consequences of Illegal Drugs: A Composite Indicator Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(2), pages 501-529, September.
    8. Lorena Charrier & Michela Bersia & Alessio Vieno & Rosanna Irene Comoretto & Mindaugas Štelemėkas & Paola Nardone & Tibor Baška & Paola Dalmasso & Paola Berchialla, 2022. "Forecasting Frequent Alcohol Use among Adolescents in HBSC Countries: A Bayesian Framework for Making Predictions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Hayat, Azmat & Mohd Shafiai, Dr Muhammad Hakimi & Haron, Mohamad Sabri & Shah, Sy. Munawar, 2018. "Alcoholic Drinks and Public Interest in case of Noe-liberalism and Islam," MPRA Paper 86893, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Davison, Colleen M. & Ford, Catherine S. & Peters, Paul A. & Hawe, Penelope, 2011. "Community-driven alcohol policy in Canada's northern territories 1970-2008," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 34-40, September.
    11. Issaka Dialga, 2017. "A Sustainability Index of Mining Countries," Working Papers halshs-01500643, HAL.
    12. Byomkesh Talukder & Keith W. Hipel & Gary W. vanLoon, 2017. "Developing Composite Indicators for Agricultural Sustainability Assessment: Effect of Normalization and Aggregation Techniques," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, November.
    13. Nadia Minian & Anna Ivanova & Sabrina Voci & Scott Veldhuizen & Laurie Zawertailo & Dolly Baliunas & Aliya Noormohamed & Norman Giesbrecht & Peter Selby, 2020. "Computerized Clinical Decision Support System for Prompting Brief Alcohol Interventions with Treatment Seeking Smokers: A Sex-Based Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Umar, Maida & Asghar, Zahid, 2018. "SDG Index for Pakistan at Provincial Level," MPRA Paper 83997, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Gisela Di Meglio & Metka Stare & Andrés Maroto & Luis Rubalcaba, 2015. "Public Services Performance: An Extended Framework and Empirical Assessment across the Enlarged EU," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(2), pages 321-341, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:h8acu_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.