IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/gwzvm_v1.html

Transport-induced gentrification, perceived accessibility, and mobility practices: What happens to those who stay in their communities?

Author

Listed:
  • de Assis, Rebeca Froés
  • Loureiro, Carlos Felipe Grangeiro
  • Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio

Abstract

Transport-induced gentrification (TIG) has received growing scholarly attention, often focusing on displaced groups. Much less is known about the experiences of low-income incumbents who remain in place, particularly in unequal cities as the ones in the Global South. This paper addresses this gap, investigating if TIG generates reliance on motorized modes due to the social exclusion of low-income incumbents. We argue that urban reshaping near newly implemented transport infrastructures and services may isolate low-income communities as nearby opportunities become less affordable, prompting incumbents to adapt their mobility practices, reshaping where and how they travel to engage in out-of-home activities. Using perceived accessibility as an analytical lens, we applied a qualitative approach named process tracing method in an informal settlement impacted by a Light Rail Transit system in Fortaleza, Brazil. Evidence was collected through 29 semi-structured interviews and assessed using process tracing tests. Our findings suggest that while incumbents benefit from the proximity to new supermarkets, they feel increasingly excluded from nearby leisure and commercial opportunities. Consequently, many rely on motorized modes and on-demand transport services to reach more distant destinations. These findings contribute to the transportation research agenda by framing TIG as a distinct type of Transport-related Social Exclusion and demonstrate how urban reshaping near transit stations may undermine perceived accessibility for low-income incumbents, even when objective accessibility appears to improve.

Suggested Citation

  • de Assis, Rebeca Froés & Loureiro, Carlos Felipe Grangeiro & Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio, 2026. "Transport-induced gentrification, perceived accessibility, and mobility practices: What happens to those who stay in their communities?," SocArXiv gwzvm_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:gwzvm_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/gwzvm_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a2ad689e7f1ade9eb9e3130/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/gwzvm_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Wee, Bert, 2016. "Accessible accessibility research challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 9-16.
    2. Liang Ma & Jason Cao, 2019. "How perceptions mediate the effects of the built environment on travel behavior?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 175-197, February.
    3. Church, A. & Frost, M. & Sullivan, K., 2000. "Transport and social exclusion in London," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 195-205, July.
    4. Laura McCarthy & Alexa Delbosc & Maarten Kroesen & Mathijs Haas, 2023. "Travel attitudes or behaviours: Which one changes when they conflict?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 25-42, February.
    5. Martens, Karel & Golub, Aaron & Robinson, Glenn, 2012. "A justice-theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefits: Implications for transportation planning practice in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 684-695.
    6. Winifred Curran, 2004. "Gentrification and the Nature of Work: Exploring the Links in Williamsburg, Brooklyn," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(7), pages 1243-1258, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Oviedo & Luis A. Guzman, 2020. "Revisiting Accessibility in a Context of Sustainable Transport: Capabilities and Inequalities in Bogotá," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Ana Gil Solá & Bertil Vilhelmson, 2018. "Negotiating Proximity in Sustainable Urban Planning: A Swedish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Wang, Yongcheng & Wong, Yiik Diew & Du, Bo & Lum, Kit Meng & Goh, Kelvin, 2024. "Sociospatial inclusiveness of streets through the lens of urban pedestrian mobilities: Go-along interviews with less mobile pedestrians in Singapore," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Silver, Kelli & Lopes, André & Vale, David & da Costa, Nuno Marques, 2023. "The inequality effects of public transport fare: The case of Lisbon's fare reform," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Negm, Hisham & De Vos, Jonas & Pot, Felix & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2025. "Perceived accessibility: A literature review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Oviedo, Daniel & Nieto-Combariza, Maria José & Chong, Alexandria Z.W., 2025. "Everyday perceived accessibility in unwalkable cities in Sub-Saharan Africa," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio & Lucas, Karen & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Hurtubia, Ricardo, 2020. "Understanding accessibility through public transport users' experiences: A mixed methods approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Pyrialakou, V. Dimitra & Gkritza, Konstantina & Fricker, Jon D., 2016. "Accessibility, mobility, and realized travel behavior: Assessing transport disadvantage from a policy perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 252-269.
    9. Luz, Gregorio & da Silva Portugal, Licinio, 2021. "Understanding Transport-Related Social Exclusion Through the Lens of Capabilities Approach," OSF Preprints 4d3uy, Center for Open Science.
    10. Lowe, Kate & Barajas, Jesus & Coren, Chelsie, 2023. "“It's annoying, confusing, and it's irritating”: Lived expertise for epistemic justice and understanding inequitable accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    11. Grisé, Emily & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2017. "Evaluating the relationship between socially (dis)advantaged neighbourhoods and customer satisfaction of bus service in London, U.K," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 166-175.
    12. Ivan Šišak & Aleksandar Lukić, 2025. "Provision and Accessibility of Services of General Interest in Functional Urban Regions: The Case of Zagreb, Croatia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, May.
    13. Lättman, Katrin & Olsson, Lars E. & Friman, Margareta, 2016. "Development and test of the Perceived Accessibility Scale (PAC) in public transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 257-263.
    14. Krysiński Dawid & Szczepański Jacek, 2025. "Transport-Related Social Exclusion Among Secondary School Students in Different Sub-Regions of Lower Silesia, Poland: An Activity-Based Approach," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 44(2), pages 45-58.
    15. Hamidi, Zahra & Camporeale, Rosalia & Caggiani, Leonardo, 2019. "Inequalities in access to bike-and-ride opportunities: Findings for the city of Malmö," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 673-688.
    16. Nakshi, Paromita & Lucas, Karen & Farber, Steven, 2025. "Travelling in the margins: Impacts of transport poverty on travel attitudes and behaviours," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Shafiq, Mudassar & Lobo, António & Couto, António, 2024. "Equity of access to rail services by complementary motorized and active modes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    18. Moleman, Milan L. & Kroesen, Maarten, 2025. "Exploring the interplay of transport, social, and geographical disadvantages and its effect on perceived inaccessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    19. Jun Yang & Andong Guo & Xueming Li & Tai Huang, 2018. "Study of the Impact of a High-Speed Railway Opening on China’s Accessibility Pattern and Spatial Equality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    20. Edward Randal & Caroline Shaw & Alistair Woodward & Philippa Howden-Chapman & Alex Macmillan & Jamie Hosking & Ralph Chapman & Andrew M. Waa & Michael Keall, 2020. "Fairness in Transport Policy: A New Approach to Applying Distributive Justice Theories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:gwzvm_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.