IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/9rsgu_v1.html

Measuring What Matters: Accessibility Measures to Evaluate Transport-Related Social Exclusion

Author

Listed:
  • Luz, Gregorio
  • van Wee, Bert
  • Rodriguez, Daniel A.
  • Pereira, Rafael H. M.
  • Farber, Steven

Abstract

Accessibility measures are widely used to assess transport equity and identify groups at risk of transport-related social exclusion (TRSE). Yet little guidance exists on how to select measures that are both theoretically robust and practically usable, and many researchers and practitioners remain unaware of the implications, biases, and consequences of their methodological choices. This paper proposes an analytical framework that consolidates dispersed arguments in the literature into a single, structured reference for evaluating accessibility measures. Developed through a comprehensive review and validated by an international expert survey, the framework comprises thirteen criteria—ten theoretical and three practical. It clarifies the ideal conditions for assessing TRSE, the trade-offs between theoretical rigor and practical feasibility, and the biases that arise from different methodological decisions. Rather than prescribing a single ideal measure, the framework makes explicit the assumptions, strengths, and limitations underlying different approaches, supporting more transparent and context-sensitive TRSE evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Luz, Gregorio & van Wee, Bert & Rodriguez, Daniel A. & Pereira, Rafael H. M. & Farber, Steven, 2025. "Measuring What Matters: Accessibility Measures to Evaluate Transport-Related Social Exclusion," SocArXiv 9rsgu_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:9rsgu_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/9rsgu_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/690da36ef7cb50f880be2e5e/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/9rsgu_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pot, Felix Johan & van Wee, Bert & Tillema, Taede, 2021. "Perceived accessibility: What it is and why it differs from calculated accessibility measures based on spatial data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Kelobonye, Keone & Zhou, Heng & McCarney, Gary & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia), 2020. "Measuring the accessibility and spatial equity of urban services under competition using the cumulative opportunities measure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Qiyang & Zhe, Tao, 2026. "Mapping the evolution of transport justice research: A structural topic modelling approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Chan, Tommy Ho-Yin, 2025. "Socio-material perspectives on perceived accessibility of cycling: A sociological inquiry into practices, regulations and informal rules," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Zha, Wenbin & Li, Jian, 2025. "Understanding commuters' perceived accessibility and travel intentions under rainstorm warnings in Shanghai, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 276-294.
    4. Guzman, Luis A. & Cantillo-Garcia, Victor A. & Oviedo, Daniel & Arellana, Julian, 2023. "How much is accessibility worth? Utility-based accessibility to evaluate transport policies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Cui, Mengying & Yu, Lijie & Nie, Shaoyu & Dai, Zhe & Ge, Ying-en & Levinson, David, 2025. "How do access and spatial dependency shape metro passenger flows," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Knierim, Lukas & Schlüter, Jan Christian, 2021. "The attitude of potentially less mobile people towards demand responsive transport in a rural area in central Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    7. Ning, Yihong & Deng, Songyuan & Chen, Yuche, 2025. "Navigating barriers: examining social equality through transportation disadvantages and perceived healthcare accessibility in South Carolina," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Negm, Hisham & De Vos, Jonas & Pot, Felix & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2025. "Perceived accessibility: A literature review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    9. Yoo, Sihyun & Beumer, Ruben & van Wee, Bert & Mouter, Niek & Molin, Eric, 2025. "Perceived accessibility by air transportation: A focus group study of potential air travelers in The Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Freiria, Susana & Sousa, Nuno & Calvo-Poyo, Francisco, 2022. "Spatial analysis of the impact of transport accessibility on regional performance: A study for Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Felix Johan Pot & Eva Heinen & Taede Tillema, 2025. "Sufficient access? Activity participation, perceived accessibility and transport-related social exclusion across spatial contexts," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1679-1707, August.
    12. Oviedo, Daniel & Nieto-Combariza, Maria José & Chong, Alexandria Z.W., 2025. "Everyday perceived accessibility in unwalkable cities in Sub-Saharan Africa," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    13. Acheampong, Ransford A. & Asabere, Stephen Boahen, 2022. "Urban expansion and differential accessibility by car and public transport in the Greater Kumasi city-region, Ghana—A geospatial modelling approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    14. Drummond, John Amin & Malamud, Bruce D. & Mulligan, Joe & Bukachi, Vera & Talib, Manshur & Wandera, Amos & Pelling, Mark & Taylor, Faith E., 2023. "COVID-19 Interventions in an informal settlement: A spatial analysis of accessibility in Kibera, Kenya," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    15. Fitwi Wolday & Lars Böcker, 2023. "Exploring changes in residential preference during COVID-19: Implications to contemporary urban planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(5), pages 1280-1297, June.
    16. Yuen, Weilun & Lee, Leonard & Leong, Waiyan & Carmon, Ziv & Chen, Charlene & Ng, Kai Xuan & Chong, Wen Wei, 2025. "Perceived accessibility of public transport predicts intention to give up car ownership but objective accessibility does not," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    17. Jasso Chávez, José Arturo & Manaugh, Kevin, 2025. "How does the spatial scale impact accessibility analysis and equity? The case of accessibility to supermarkets in Montreal," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    18. van Wee, Bert, 2022. "Accessibility and equity: A conceptual framework and research agenda," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    19. Pinto, Davi Garcia Lopes & Loureiro, Carlos Felipe Grangeiro & Sousa, Francelino Franco Leite de Matos & Motte-Baumvol, Benjamin, 2023. "The effects of informality on socio-spatial inequalities in accessibility to job opportunities: Evidence from Fortaleza, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Singh, Shivendu Shekhar & Sarkar, Basudatta, 2022. "Cumulative opportunity-based accessibility measurement framework in rural India," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 138-151.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:9rsgu_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.