IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/9rsgu_v1.html

Measuring What Matters: Accessibility Measures to Evaluate Transport-Related Social Exclusion

Author

Listed:
  • Luz, Gregorio
  • van Wee, Bert
  • Rodriguez, Daniel A.
  • Pereira, Rafael H. M.
  • Farber, Steven

Abstract

Accessibility measures are widely used to assess transport equity and identify groups at risk of transport-related social exclusion (TRSE). Yet little guidance exists on how to select measures that are both theoretically robust and practically usable, and many researchers and practitioners remain unaware of the implications, biases, and consequences of their methodological choices. This paper proposes an analytical framework that consolidates dispersed arguments in the literature into a single, structured reference for evaluating accessibility measures. Developed through a comprehensive review and validated by an international expert survey, the framework comprises thirteen criteria—ten theoretical and three practical. It clarifies the ideal conditions for assessing TRSE, the trade-offs between theoretical rigor and practical feasibility, and the biases that arise from different methodological decisions. Rather than prescribing a single ideal measure, the framework makes explicit the assumptions, strengths, and limitations underlying different approaches, supporting more transparent and context-sensitive TRSE evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Luz, Gregorio & van Wee, Bert & Rodriguez, Daniel A. & Pereira, Rafael H. M. & Farber, Steven, 2025. "Measuring What Matters: Accessibility Measures to Evaluate Transport-Related Social Exclusion," SocArXiv 9rsgu_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:9rsgu_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/9rsgu_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/690da36ef7cb50f880be2e5e/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/9rsgu_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pot, Felix Johan & van Wee, Bert & Tillema, Taede, 2021. "Perceived accessibility: What it is and why it differs from calculated accessibility measures based on spatial data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Kelobonye, Keone & Zhou, Heng & McCarney, Gary & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia), 2020. "Measuring the accessibility and spatial equity of urban services under competition using the cumulative opportunities measure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Negm, Hisham & De Vos, Jonas & Pot, Felix & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2025. "Perceived accessibility: A literature review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Qiyang & Zhe, Tao, 2026. "Mapping the evolution of transport justice research: A structural topic modelling approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Dai, Teqi & Guo, Kaifei & Jiang, Huaxiong & Wang, Jiao’e, 2026. "Exploring the relationship between accessibility and travel satisfaction in remote and challenging terrain of Tibet, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    3. Juschten, Maria & Hössinger, Reinhard, 2026. "Assessing commuting-related accessibility inequalities in rural Innviertel, Austria," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    4. Soza-Parra, Jaime & Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio, 2025. "What shapes perceived accessibility? Unpacking the interplay of sociodemographics, latent perceptions, and traditional accessibility metrics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Geurs, Karst & van Wee, Bert, 2026. "A five-component conceptual model of calculated and perceived accessibility: Literature review and research directions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Negm, Hisham & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2026. "Operationalizing accessibility thresholds: Identifying perceived minimum and sufficient accessibility in Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Yin, Zehui & Scott, Darren M., 2026. "Wheels within reach: Evaluating bike share equity impacts of a pseudo-free student pass using network-distance-based kernel density," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Siqueira, Matheus Fontenelle & Loureiro, Carlos Felipe Grangeiro, 2026. "Placing Accessibility At The Center Of Travel Behavior Modeling: A Conceptual Framework," SocArXiv xa23j_v1, Center for Open Science.
    9. La Delfa, Alessandro & Han, Zheng, 2026. "Habit or constraint? Car commuters' adoption of autonomous ride-hailing: A hybrid choice approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    10. Zhang, Yuerong & Cao, Yanghui, 2025. "Towards a combined framework for public electric vehicle charger accessibility in London," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    11. Chan, Tommy Ho-Yin, 2025. "Socio-material perspectives on perceived accessibility of cycling: A sociological inquiry into practices, regulations and informal rules," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Zha, Wenbin & Li, Jian, 2025. "Understanding commuters' perceived accessibility and travel intentions under rainstorm warnings in Shanghai, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 276-294.
    13. Dennis Gaus & Georg Hirte, 2023. "Agglomeration or Market Access? The Defining Factors of Firms' Location Choice," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2045, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    14. Pot, Felix & Rauws, Ward & Ramezani, Samira & Kajosaari, Anna Ulrika & Humer, Alois, 2026. "Principles for place-based accessibility planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    15. Guzman, Luis A. & Cantillo-Garcia, Victor A. & Oviedo, Daniel & Arellana, Julian, 2023. "How much is accessibility worth? Utility-based accessibility to evaluate transport policies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Pot, Felix Johan & Koster, Sierdjan & Tillema, Taede, 2023. "Perceived accessibility and residential self-selection in the Netherlands," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    17. Robbennolt, Dale & Beliveau, Anna & Bhat, Chandra R., 2025. "An investigation of physical participation dissonance and virtual activity participation in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    18. Cui, Mengying & Yu, Lijie & Nie, Shaoyu & Dai, Zhe & Ge, Ying-en & Levinson, David, 2025. "How do access and spatial dependency shape metro passenger flows," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    19. Chakrabarti, Sandip & Verma, Muskan, 2025. "Analysis of the spatial range advantage of vehicle owners and its implications on vehicle ownership aspirations: Insights from India and takeaways for transportation equity," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Sajadi, Afshin, 2024. "Principles of just urban land use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:9rsgu_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.