IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/9h8ks_v1.html

Organisational Knowledge Brokerage in Science Diplomacy: The Making of AI Governance at UNESCO and the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • McCarthy, Adam
  • Naisbitt, Alice
  • Dos Santos Maia, Pedro
  • Riberio, Barbara
  • Flanagan, Kieron
  • Shapira, Philip

    (The University of Manchester)

Abstract

We examine how expertise, evidence and authority are organised in the international governance of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and what this reveals about the practice of science diplomacy. Science-diplomacy scholarship has become increasingly attentive to the political character of expertise and to the ways knowledge is mobilised within international governance. Yet less attention has been paid to the organisational practices through which such knowledge is brokered within governance processes. Drawing on documentary analysis and 23 semi-structured interviews, we compare UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and the EU AI Act. Through an abductive analysis, we develop Organisational Knowledge Brokerage (OKB) to explain how a contested object such as AI is made workable for governance. We identify four connected practices through which this occurs: stabilising the governance object, legitimising expertise, building authority and operationalising governance. These practices took different forms under contrasting institutional mandates and governing capacities. UNESCO worked through global intergovernmental standard-setting and implementation support, while the EU combined supranational regulation with expert advice and Member State coordination. Across both cases, OKB also produced a cross-cutting process that we term normative translation, through which contested values acquired practical meaning in definitions, assessments and procedures. We show how this brokerage allowed each organisation to establish workable and revisable settlements around AI under conditions of technological uncertainty and dispersed authority. The article therefore develops a practice-oriented account of science diplomacy as organisational work through which knowledge, values and institutional authority are assembled for collective action in international technology governance.

Suggested Citation

  • McCarthy, Adam & Naisbitt, Alice & Dos Santos Maia, Pedro & Riberio, Barbara & Flanagan, Kieron & Shapira, Philip, 2026. "Organisational Knowledge Brokerage in Science Diplomacy: The Making of AI Governance at UNESCO and the European Union," SocArXiv 9h8ks_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:9h8ks_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/9h8ks_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6ac61235a6c946105df7cc5c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/9h8ks_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inga Ulnicane, 2025. "Governance fix? Power and politics in controversies about governing generative AI," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 44(1), pages 70-84.
    2. Pierre-Bruno Ruffini, 2017. "Science and Diplomacy – A New Dimension of International Relations," Post-Print hal-02970666, HAL.
    3. repec:osf:socarx:ubxgk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Sam Robinson & Matthew Adamson & Gordon Barrett & Lif Lund & Simone Turchetti & Aya Homei & Péter Marton & Leah Aronowsky & Iqra Choudry & Johan Gärdebo & Jaehwan Hyun & Gerardo Ienna & Carringtone Ki, 2023. "The globalization of science diplomacy in the early 1970s: a historical exploration," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 749-758.
    5. Veale, Michael & Matus, Kira & Gorwa, Robert, 2023. "AI and Global Governance: Modalities, Rationales, Tensions," SocArXiv ubxgk, Center for Open Science.
    6. Peter Cihon & Matthijs M. Maas & Luke Kemp, 2020. "Fragmentation and the Future: Investigating Architectures for International AI Governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(5), pages 545-556, November.
    7. Veale, Michael & Matus, Kira & Gorwa, Robert, 2023. "AI and Global Governance: Modalities, Rationales, Tensions," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19, pages 255-275.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huw Roberts & Mariarosaria Taddeo & Luciano Floridi, 2026. "A Framework for Evaluating Global AI Governance Initiatives," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(2), pages 189-199, May.
    2. Andrew J. Keith, 2024. "Governance of artificial intelligence in Southeast Asia," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(5), pages 937-954, November.
    3. Esmat Zaidan & Imad Antoine Ibrahim, 2024. "AI Governance in a Complex and Rapidly Changing Regulatory Landscape: A Global Perspective," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Vasiliki Koniakou, 2023. "From the “rush to ethics” to the “race for governance” in Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 71-102, February.
    5. Anna-Lena Rüland & Lise H. Andersen & Alan Kai Hassen & Carringtone Kinyanjui & Annika Ralfs & Bruno Iochins Grisci, 2025. "Science diplomacy: A global research field? Findings from a bibliometric analysis of the science diplomacy scholarship of the past twenty years," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(8), pages 4697-4722, August.
    6. Kenneth W. Abbott & Benjamin Faude, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 263-291, April.
    7. Rüffin, Nicolas & Rüland, Anna-Lena, 2022. "Between global collaboration and national competition: Unraveling the many faces of Arctic science diplomacy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58((Art. No.), pages 1-12.
    8. Leonard Schuette & Hylke Dijkstra, 2023. "The show must go on: The EU's quest to sustain multilateral institutions since 2016," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1318-1336, September.
    9. Tuzov, Viktor & Lin, Fen, 2024. "Two paths of balancing technology and ethics: A comparative study on AI governance in China and Germany," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    10. Anna‐Lena Rüland & Nicolas Rüffin, 2024. "A comparison of British and German parliamentary discourses on science diplomacy over time," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 247-259, May.
    11. Joshua Farley & Dakota Walker & Bryn Geffert & Nina Chandler & Lauren Eisel & Murray Friedberg & Dominic Portelli, 2024. "Creating a Transnational Green Knowledge Commons for a Socially Just Sustainability Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Simone Arnaldi & Alessandro Lombardo & Angela Tessarolo, 2021. "A preliminary study of science diplomacy networks in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    13. Cupać, Jelena & Schopmans, Hendrik & Tuncer-Ebetürk, İrem, 2024. "Democratization in the age of artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(5), pages 899-921.
    14. Jonas Tallberg & Magnus Lundgren & Johannes Geith, 2023. "AI Regulation in the European Union: Examining Non-State Actor Preferences," Papers 2305.11523, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    15. Kaya-Kasikci, Sevgi & Glass, Chris R. & Camero, Eglis Chacon & Minaeva, Ekaterina, 2025. "University Positioning in AI Policies: Comparative Insights from National Policies and Non-State Actor Influences in China, the European Union, India, Russia, and the United States," SocArXiv a42rs_v1, Center for Open Science.
    16. Derya Buyuktanir Karacan, 2021. "Science diplomacy as a foreign policy tool for Turkey and the ramifications of collaboration with the EU," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Wang, Xu & Xie, Fang & Liu, Binbin, 2026. "Governance efficiency and upgrade pathways of international generative AI policies and regulations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    18. Zaidan, Esmat & Truby, Jon & Ibrahim, Imad Antoine & Hoppe, Thomas, 2026. "Hybrid global governance for responsible and inclusive Artificial Intelligence: Proposing a new Sustainable Development Goal 18," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    19. Marta Abrantes & Raquel Vaz-Pinto, 2024. "Science diplomacy in the European Union: mapping the Portuguese case (1986–2021)," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Governance of artificial intelligence [Application of artificial intelligence for development of intelligent transport system in smart cities]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(2), pages 137-157.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:9h8ks_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.