IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/gehwz_v2.html

Democratic Accountability with Citizen Coproduction

Author

Listed:
  • Schnakenberg, Keith
  • Turner, Ian R

    (University of Pittsburgh)

Abstract

Many policies require citizens to actively participate in their implementation in order to be successful, a situation referred to as citizen coproduction. Though citizen coproduction is necessary in many policy areas, it could create difficulties for democratic accountability because citizens and politicians share responsibility for policy failures and attribution of blame may be difficult. We analyze the problem of democratic accountability with citizen coproduction in the context of a model in which politicians, who vary with respect to their competence at selecting policies, choose whether to implement policies whose success depends on citizen coproduction choices. For citizens, the problem is one of attribution: when coproduction is low, it may be hard to select good incumbents because policy failures are frequent even when policy choices are good. Incumbents anticipate these effects, which sometimes implies that they are less likely to choose reforms when they are more likely to be successful.

Suggested Citation

  • Schnakenberg, Keith & Turner, Ian R, 2026. "Democratic Accountability with Citizen Coproduction," OSF Preprints gehwz_v2, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:gehwz_v2
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/gehwz_v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a2ae5b0b30c13542d9e3085/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/gehwz_v2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucy Martin & Pia J. Raffler, 2021. "Fault Lines: The Effects of Bureaucratic Power on Electoral Accountability," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 210-224, January.
    2. Schwindt-Bayer,Leslie A. & Tavits,Margit, 2016. "Clarity of Responsibility, Accountability, and Corruption," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107127647.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedro C. Magalhães & Luís Aguiar-Conraria, 2017. "Procedural Fairness and Economic Voting," NIPE Working Papers 07/2017, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    2. Hazama,Yasushi, 2023. "Welfare, Corruption, and the Economic Vote of Punishment: The Turkish Case," IDE Discussion Papers 908, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    3. William Akoto, 2022. "Accountability and cyber conflict: examining institutional constraints on the use of cyber proxies," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(3), pages 311-332, May.
    4. Eric C. C. Chang, 2020. "Corruption predictability and corruption voting in Asian democracies," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 307-326, September.
    5. Krambia-Kapardis Maria & Stylianou Ioanna & Demetriou Salomi, 2022. "Nonlinear nexus between corruption and tourism arrivals: a global analysis," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1997-2024, October.
    6. Mai Hassan & Horacio Larreguy & Stuart Russell, 2024. "Who Gets Hired? Political Patronage and Bureaucratic Favoritism," Post-Print hal-04922873, HAL.
    7. Sarah Brierley, 2020. "Unprincipled Principals: Co‐opted Bureaucrats and Corruption in Ghana," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 209-222, April.
    8. Joshua A Strayhorn, 2019. "Plausible deniability," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 31(4), pages 600-625, October.
    9. Livert, Felipe & Weaver, Julie Anne & Bordón, Paola, 2025. "Rewarding performance in disaster response: Evidence from local governments in Latin America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:gehwz_v2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.