IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/5nwsa.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Economics is an Evolutionary, Mathematical Science: How Could Veblen’s View Of Economics Been So Different Than C. S. Peirce’s?

Author

Listed:
  • Wible, James R.
  • Assistant, JHET

Abstract

More than a century ago one of the most famous essays ever written in American economics appeared in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, “Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?” There Thorstein Veblen claimed that economics was too dominated by a mechanistic view to address the problems of economic life. Since the world and the economy had come to be viewed from an evolutionary perspective after Darwin, it was rather straight forward to argue that the increasingly abstract mathematical character of economics was non-evolutionary. However, Veblen had studied with a first-rate intellect, Charles Sanders Peirce, attending his elementary logic class. If Peirce had written about the future of economics in 1898, it would have been very different than Veblen’s essay. Peirce could have written that economics should become an evolutionary mathematical science and that much of classical and neoclassical economics could be interpreted from an evolutionary perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Wible, James R. & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "Why Economics is an Evolutionary, Mathematical Science: How Could Veblen’s View Of Economics Been So Different Than C. S. Peirce’s?," OSF Preprints 5nwsa, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:5nwsa
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/5nwsa
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5f73439c46080904001af14c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/5nwsa?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Mirowski, 1981. "Is There a Mathematical Neoinstitutional Economics?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 593-613, September.
    2. Dimand, Robert W., 1998. "Fisher and Veblen: Two Paths for American Economics," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 449-465, December.
    3. Robert Griffin, 1998. "What Veblen Owed to Peirce—The Social Theory of Logic," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 733-757, September.
    4. Boulding, Kenneth E., 1981. "Agricultural Economics In An Evolutionary Perspective," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279250, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. John Hall & Oliver Whybrow, 2008. "Continuity and Continuousness: The Chain of Ideas Linking Peirce’s Synechism to Veblen’s Cumulative Causation," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 349-355, June.
    6. James Wible, 1994. "Charles Sanders Peirce's economy of research," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 135-160.
    7. E. E. Liebhafsky, 1993. "The Influence of Charles Sanders Peirce on Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 741-754, September.
    8. Alan W. Dyer, 1986. "Veblen on Scientific Creativity: The Influence of Charles S. Peirce," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 21-41, March.
    9. Kenneth E. Boulding, 1981. "Agricultural Economics in an Evolutionary Perspective," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(5), pages 788-795.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shabman, Leonard A., 1990. "Environmental Hazards of Farming: Thinking About the Management Challenge," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 11-22, July.
    2. Bruce A. Kirchhoff, 1992. "Entrepreneurship's Contribution to Economics," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(2), pages 93-112, January.
    3. Mounir Amdaoud, 2019. "Ressources naturelles, innovation et développement économique : vers une nouvelle approche," CEPN Working Papers 2019-06, Centre d'Economie de l'Université de Paris Nord.
    4. Luis Suarez-Villa, 1988. "Metropolitan Evolution, Sectoral Economic Change, and the City Size Distribution," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Schreiner, Mark, 1995. "Meta-Rules," Economics and Sociology Occasional Papers - ESO Series 28331, Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics.
    6. Robert Griffin, 1998. "What Veblen Owed to Peirce—The Social Theory of Logic," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 733-757, September.
    7. Vink, N., 1993. "Entrepreneurs And The Political Economy Of Reform In South African Agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 32(4), December.
    8. Geoffrey M. Hodgson & Juha-Antti Lamberg, 2018. "The past and future of evolutionary economics: some reflections based on new bibliometric evidence," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 167-187, June.
    9. Adam Day, 2022. "States of disorder: An ecosystems approach to state-building in conflict-affected countries," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-154, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Cook, Michael L., 1992. "Agribusiness In A Global Economy: Challenges For An Evolving Profession," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-6, July.
    11. Armaghan Chizaryfard & Paolo Trucco & Cali Nuur, 2021. "The transformation to a circular economy: framing an evolutionary view," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 475-504, April.
    12. Robert Neild, 2017. "The future of economics: The case for an evolutionary approach," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(1), pages 164-172, March.
    13. Peter Calkins, 2009. "Sufficiency Economy Matrices: Multi-Period Optimization for Local Development Planners," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 5(2), pages 305-332, July.
    14. Elias L. Khalil, 1997. "Chaos Theory Versus Heisenberg's Uncertainty: Risk, Uncertainty and Economic Theory," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 41(2), pages 27-40, October.
    15. Nima Norouzi, 2022. "Learning Economy: a New Hope to Achieve a Sustainable Economic System," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    16. E. Peterson & Fred Ruppel & Daniel Padberg, 1988. "Assessing agricultural education: Agricultural economics at a crossroads," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 5(4), pages 26-33, September.
    17. Dimand, Robert W. & Koehn, Robert H., 2000. "The Struggle Over the Soul of Economics: Institutionalist and Neoclassical Economists in America between the Wars: Yuval P. Yonay, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1998, xiii+290. ISBN 0-691," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 575-581, September.
    18. Philippe Holstein, 2014. "The sustainability of colonial and postcolonial island economies : the case of Reunion Island [La soutenabilité des économies insulaires coloniales et postcoloniales : le cas de l’île de La Réunion," SciencePo Working papers Main tel-03516478, HAL.
    19. Calkins, Peter H., 1995. "Transition Strategies Towards a New World Order for Five Rural Worlds," 1994 Conference, August 22-29, 1994, Harare, Zimbabwe 183381, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Jackson, William A., 1995. "Population Growth: A Comparison of Evolutionary Views," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 22(6), pages 3-16.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:5nwsa. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.