IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Incorporating Estimates of Household Production of Non-Market Services into International Comparisons of Material Well-Being


  • Nadim Ahmad


  • Seung-Hee Koh



This paper reports on work undertaken within the Statistics Directorate to measure the value of household production of non-market services, in order to better compare material well-being across countries. The work is being conducted under the aegis of the National Accounts Working Party and as input into the broader OECD activity on Measuring Progress. It responds to the growing recognition of the need to place a greater emphasis on the development of statistics that focus on the household perspective. The study shows that at a national level the estimates are acutely sensitive to the value placed on labour used in producing these services. However, it also demonstrates that relatively robust cross-country comparisons are obtainable using estimates converted on a purchasing power parity basis. For China, for example, GDP per capita relative to the United States improves by 50% when all household production of non-market services is included. Indeed the study demonstrates that including these services is particularly significant for comparisons of 'richer' and ' poorer' countries... Cet article rend compte du travail réalisé au sein de la Direction des Statistiques pour mesurer la valeur des services non marchands produits par les ménages, dans le but d'améliorer la comparaison du bien-être matériel entre pays. Ce travail est accompli sous l'égide du Groupe de Travail sur la Comptabilité Nationale, et censé être incorporé à l'activité plus générale de mesure du progrès de l'OCDE. Il répond à la reconnaissance croissante du besoin de mettre l'accent sur le développement de statistiques centrées sur la perspective des ménages. Cette étude montre qu'au niveau national, les estimations sont extrêmement sensibles à la valeur attribuée au prix du travail accompli pour la production de ces services. Cependant, il démontre également que des comparaisons relativement robustes entre pays peuvent être obtenues en utilisant des estimations converties sur la base d'une parité de pouvoir d'achat. Pour la Chine par exemple, le PIB par habitant par rapport aux États-Unis est amélioré de 50% lorsque toute la production de services non marchands des ménages est inclue. L'étude démontre d'ailleurs qu'inclure ces services est particulièrement significatif dans les comparaisons entre pays "riches" et pays "pauvres"...

Suggested Citation

  • Nadim Ahmad & Seung-Hee Koh, 2011. "Incorporating Estimates of Household Production of Non-Market Services into International Comparisons of Material Well-Being," OECD Statistics Working Papers 2011/7, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:stdaaa:2011/7-en

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Paul Schreyer & W. Erwin Diewert, 2014. "Household Production, Leisure, and Living Standards," NBER Chapters,in: Measuring Economic Sustainability and Progress, pages 89-114 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Vivien Procher & Nolan Ritter & Colin Vance, 2014. "Making dough or baking dough? Spousal housework responsibilities in Germany, 1992-2011," Schumpeter Discussion Papers SDP14004, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    3. Bridgman, Benjamin, 2016. "Home productivity," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 60-76.
    4. repec:zbw:rwirep:0472 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Vivien Procher & Nolan Ritter & Colin Vance, 2014. "Making Dough or Baking Dough? Spousal Housework Responsibilities in Germany, 1992-2011," Ruhr Economic Papers 0472, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stdaaa:2011/7-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.