IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/dafaab/1-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Funding Rules and Actuarial Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Colin Pugh

Abstract

This paper outlines the regulatory framework within which occupational defined benefit pension plans are financed and addresses the challenges facing the funding of such plans. The Appendices include a summary and discussion of the funding regulations in twelve OECD countries plus Brazil – all of which have a long history of DB plans. The paper draws on these experiences in... Règles de financement et méthodes actuarielles Ce document décrit le cadre réglementaire dans lequel s’insèrent les plans de pensions professionnelles à prestations définies et examine les défis posés par le financement de ces plans. Les appendices sont consacrés à une présentation des règles de financement en vigueur dans 12 pays de l’OCDE plus le Brésil – tous pays qui ont...

Suggested Citation

  • Colin Pugh, 2006. "Funding Rules and Actuarial Methods," OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions 1, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:dafaab:1-en
    DOI: 10.1787/274307371724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/274307371724
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/274307371724?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ian Tower & Gregorio Impavido, 2009. "How the Financial Crisis Affects Pensions and Insurance and Why the Impacts Matter," IMF Working Papers 2009/151, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Chen, An & Nguyen, Thai & Stadje, Mitja, 2018. "Optimal investment under VaR-Regulation and Minimum Insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 194-209.
    3. Ioannis Vogiatzis & Costas Siriopoulos & Nikolaos Frangos, 2014. "Effects of the Public Sector downsizing on Social Security and public finance," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 64(1), pages 53-62, January-M.
    4. Broeders, Dirk & Chen, An, 2010. "Pension regulation and the market value of pension liabilities: A contingent claims analysis using Parisian options," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1201-1214, June.
    5. Mayur Ankolekar & Ramnath Shenoy & Nandan Nadkarni & Rajendra Shah, 2016. "Indian Defined Benefit Pension Plans: Evidence on Investment Risks, Fund Mandates and Funding Levels," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 41(4), pages 355-383, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    actuarial costing methods; defined benefit plan; fonds de pension; funding rule; méthodes d'évaluation actuarielles; occupational pension plan; pension fund; plans de pensions professionnelles; plans à prestations définies; regulation; règle de financement; réglementation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • J32 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:dafaab:1-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.