IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

A tale of two cycles: closure, downsizing and productivity growth in UK manufacturing, 1973-89

This paper uses the ARD, the new longitudinal database of the Census of Production, to analyse productivity at the establishment level in the two cycles of 1973-79 and 1979-89. Contrary to a commonly held view, closures did not play a major role in accounting for productivity growth in 1979-89. Establishments which exited had lower productivity than survivors but the exits were replaced by entrants which also had low productivity. Most of productivity growth was due to growth within survivors. The greatest gains occurred in the 36 establishments employing 7,500 or more in 1979; these accounted for a third of productivity growth amongst survivors. Most productivity growth occurred in establishments which downsized employment. But despite an overall fall of a quarter in employment, 16% of productivity growth occurred in establishments which expanded employment. The main difference between 1973-79 and 1979-89 was in the productivity growth rate amongst survivors. In 1973-79, it was negative overall and over half of employment was initially in establishments where productivity fell.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by National Institute of Economic and Social Research in its series NIESR Discussion Papers with number 140.

in new window

Date of creation: Aug 1998
Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:202
Contact details of provider: Postal:
2 Dean Trench Street Smith Square London SW1P 3HE

Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Library & Information Manager)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.