IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The determinants of economic efficiency in English and Welsh universities

Listed author(s):
  • Philip Stevens


With imperfect markets for the services of the higher education sector, it is important to assess the effectiveness of institutions. Previous studies have analysed the costs of universities but only one, to our knowledge, their efficiency. In this paper, we examine the costs and efficiency of institutions of higher education as suppliers of teaching and research using the method of stochastic frontier analysis. This paper is unique in that it investigates the impact of staff and student characteristics on efficiency. We find that there is inefficiency in higher education. This result is robust to the inclusion of a qualitative measure of output into the cost function. There is also evidence of convergence in the inefficiency of institutions, implying that the less efficient institutions are Ôcatching up' with those nearer to the cost frontier. Our analysis suggests that the anticipation of the introduction of tuition fees may have led to a shake-up in the less efficient universities. However, the results suggest that this effect was short-lived and offset by the more efficient universities relaxing somewhat.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by National Institute of Economic and Social Research in its series NIESR Discussion Papers with number 185.

in new window

Date of creation: Sep 2001
Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:157
Contact details of provider: Postal:
2 Dean Trench Street Smith Square London SW1P 3HE

Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Library & Information Manager)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.