Measuring Honesty and Explaining Adulteration in Naturally Occurring Markets
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Rustagi, Devesh & Kroell, Markus, 2022. "Measuring honesty and explaining adulteration in naturally occurring markets," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Martin G. Kocher & Simeon Schudy & Lisa Spantig, 2018.
"I Lie? We Lie! Why? Experimental Evidence on a Dishonesty Shift in Groups,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 3995-4008, September.
- Martin G. Kocher & Simeon Schudy & Lisa Spantig, 2016. "I Lie? We Lie! Why? Experimental Evidence on a Dishonesty Shift in Groups," CESifo Working Paper Series 6008, CESifo.
- Kocher, Martin G. & Schudy, Simeon & Spantig, Lisa, 2016. "I lie? We lie! Why? Experimental evidence on a dishonesty shift in groups," Discussion Papers in Economics 28966, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
- Kocher, Martin G. & Schudy, Simeon & Spantig, Lisa, 2018. "I Lie? We Lie! Why? Experimental Evidence on a Dishonesty Shift in Groups," Munich Reprints in Economics 62823, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
- Caroline Graf & Andreas Pondorfer & Jonathan Schulz, 2025. "Culture and gender differences in honesty," Munich Papers in Political Economy 45, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
- Bhattacharya, Haimanti & Dugar, Subhasish, 2024. "Can threats improve payoffs from bargaining in markets with retaliations? Evidence from a field experiment," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 119-137.
- Lata Gangadharan & Tarun Jain & Pushkar Maitra & Joe Vecci, 2022.
"Lab-in-the-field experiments: perspectives from research on gender,"
The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 31-59, January.
- Lata Gangadharan & Tarun Jain & Pushkar Maitra & Joe Vecci, 2021. "Lab-in-the-Field Experiments: Perspectives from Research on Gender," Monash Economics Working Papers 2021-03, Monash University, Department of Economics.
- Alem, Yonas & Eggert, Håkan & Kocher, Martin G. & Ruhinduka, Remidius D., 2018.
"Why (field) experiments on unethical behavior are important: Comparing stated and revealed behavior,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 71-85.
- Alem, Yonas & Eggert, Håkan & Kocher, Martin G. & Ruhinduka, Remidius D., 2016. "Why (field) experiments on unethical behavior are important:Comparing stated and revealed behavior," Working Papers in Economics 664, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
- Köbis, Nils & Rahwan, Zoe & Bersch, Clara & Ajaj, Tamer & Bonnefon, Jean-François & Rahwan, Iyad, 2024. "Experimental evidence that delegating to intelligent machines can increase dishonest behaviour," OSF Preprints dnjgz, Center for Open Science.
- Andrea Essl & Frauke von Bieberstein & Michael Kosfeld & Markus Kröll, 2023. "Social preferences and sales performance," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 882-905, October.
- Boutin, Delphine & Jouvin, Marine & Olié, Louis, 2024. "Assessing Dishonesty in Cocoa Value Chains: Lab-in-the-Field Evidence from Middlemen in Côte D'Ivoire," IZA Discussion Papers 17078, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- repec:osf:osfxxx:dnjgz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
More about this item
Keywords
; ; ; ; ; ;JEL classification:
- C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
- D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
- O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
- Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-AGR-2022-03-07 (Agricultural Economics)
- NEP-EXP-2022-03-07 (Experimental Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:not:notcdx:2022-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jose V Guinot Saporta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdnotuk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/not/notcdx/2022-03.html