IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/not/notcdx/2022-03.html

Measuring Honesty and Explaining Adulteration in Naturally Occurring Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Devesh Rustagi

    (School of Economics, University of Nottingham)

  • Markus Kroell

    (private sector)

Abstract

There is astounding variation in product quality sold in markets even when quality is difficult to ascertain and rules are poorly enforced. We investigate whether sellers differ in innate honesty (incur private cost to provide good quality) and whether this explains the variation in quality. Our study takes place in milk markets in India, where milkmen collude on price, customer rarely switch, and it is difficult to establish reputation. We invite milkmen to take part in a novel behavioral experiment to measure dishonesty. We then measure quality objectively as the percentage of water added to a liter of milk sold to customers. Our results show that dishonest milkmen add significantly more water to milk. Evidence from milk-testing tournament confirms that milk quality is difficult to verify. These results suggest that some sellers are willing to forego monetary gains to provide good quality in return for utility from being honest, even in an environment that encourages cheating.

Suggested Citation

  • Devesh Rustagi & Markus Kroell, 2022. "Measuring Honesty and Explaining Adulteration in Naturally Occurring Markets," Discussion Papers 2022-03, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
  • Handle: RePEc:not:notcdx:2022-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cedex/documents/papers/cedex-discussion-paper-2022-03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin G. Kocher & Simeon Schudy & Lisa Spantig, 2018. "I Lie? We Lie! Why? Experimental Evidence on a Dishonesty Shift in Groups," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 3995-4008, September.
    2. Caroline Graf & Andreas Pondorfer & Jonathan Schulz, 2025. "Culture and gender differences in honesty," Munich Papers in Political Economy 45, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    3. Bhattacharya, Haimanti & Dugar, Subhasish, 2024. "Can threats improve payoffs from bargaining in markets with retaliations? Evidence from a field experiment," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 119-137.
    4. Lata Gangadharan & Tarun Jain & Pushkar Maitra & Joe Vecci, 2022. "Lab-in-the-field experiments: perspectives from research on gender," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 31-59, January.
    5. Alem, Yonas & Eggert, Håkan & Kocher, Martin G. & Ruhinduka, Remidius D., 2018. "Why (field) experiments on unethical behavior are important: Comparing stated and revealed behavior," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 71-85.
    6. Köbis, Nils & Rahwan, Zoe & Bersch, Clara & Ajaj, Tamer & Bonnefon, Jean-François & Rahwan, Iyad, 2024. "Experimental evidence that delegating to intelligent machines can increase dishonest behaviour," OSF Preprints dnjgz, Center for Open Science.
    7. Andrea Essl & Frauke von Bieberstein & Michael Kosfeld & Markus Kröll, 2023. "Social preferences and sales performance," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 882-905, October.
    8. Boutin, Delphine & Jouvin, Marine & Olié, Louis, 2024. "Assessing Dishonesty in Cocoa Value Chains: Lab-in-the-Field Evidence from Middlemen in Côte D'Ivoire," IZA Discussion Papers 17078, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. repec:osf:osfxxx:dnjgz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:not:notcdx:2022-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jose V Guinot Saporta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdnotuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.