Asymmetric Neutrality Regulation and Innovation at the Edges: Fixed vs. Mobile Networks
We study how net neutrality regulations affect high-bandwidth content providers’ investment incentives in quality of services (QoS). We find that the effects crucially depend on network capacity levels. With a limited network capacity, the prioritized delivery services are complements to content providers' investments and can facilitate entry of high-bandwidth content. By contrast, if the network capacity is large enough, the prioritized delivery and QoS investment are substitutes. In either case, the social welfare effects of the prioritized service is ambiguous. In the limited capacity case, the beneficial effects of entry by high-band width content should be weighed against the cost of increasing congestion for other existing content. In the high capacity case, the negative impact of reduced investment incentives can be counterbalanced by the benefit of improved traffic management. Our findings have important implications for the contrasting neutrality regulations across the Atlantic: US FCC treats mobile networks more leniently than fixed networks, while the EU treats them equally.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Marc Bourreau & Frago Kourandi & Tommaso Valletti, 2014.
"Net Neutrality with Competing Internet Platforms,"
CEIS Research Paper
307, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 14 Feb 2014.
- Robin S. Lee & Tim Wu, 2009. "Subsidizing Creativity through Network Design: Zero-Pricing and Net Neutrality," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 23(3), pages 61-76, Summer.
- Jullien, Bruno & Sand-Zantman, Wilfried, 2014.
"Pricing Internet Traffic: Exclusion, Signalling and Screening,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
9896, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Jullien, Bruno & Sand-Zantman, Wilfried, 2012. "Pricing Internet Traffic: Exclusion, Signalling and Screening," TSE Working Papers 12-327, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Feb 2014.
- Bruno Jullien & Wilfried Sand-Zantman, 2014. "Pricing Internet Traffic: Exclusion, Signalling and Screening," CESifo Working Paper Series 4709, CESifo Group Munich.
- Musacchio John & Schwartz Galina & Walrand Jean, 2009. "A Two-Sided Market Analysis of Provider Investment Incentives with an Application to the Net-Neutrality Issue," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, March.
- Peitz, Martin & Schuett, Florian, 2015.
"Net neutrality and inflation of traffic,"
15-05, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.
- Schuett Florian, 2010. "Network Neutrality: A Survey of the Economic Literature," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, June.
- Carlo Reggiani & Tommaso Valletti, 2012. "Net neutrality and innovation at the core and at the edge," The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 1202, Economics, The University of Manchester.
- Krämer, Jan & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Weinhardt, Christof, 2013. "Net neutrality: A progress report," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 794-813.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:net:wpaper:1324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nicholas Economides)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.