IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/4180.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Projecting the Number of New AIDS Cases in the U.S

Author

Listed:
  • David E. Bloom
  • Sherry Glied

Abstract

This paper reviews the two leading methods used to project the number of AIDS cases: back calculation and extrapolation. These methods are assessed in light of key features of the HIV/AIDS epidemic and of data on the epidemic; they are also assessed in terms of the quality of the projections they yield. Our analysis shows that both methods have tended to overproject, often by sizable amounts, the number of AIDS cases in the U.S., especially among homosexual/bisexual males and users of blood and blood products. Our results provide no evidence that the use of AZT and other prophylaxis accounts for these projection errors. Rather, the overprojections appear to be mainly the result of a considerable reduction in the rate of new HIV infection among the gay community starting in 1983-85. A new method for projecting AIDS cases is proposed that exploits knowledge about the process generating AIDS cases and that incorporates readily available information about rates of new HIV infection. This method is far less sensitive to estimates of the incubation distribution than the method of back calculation and is shown, for the two transmission categories studied, to generate far more accurate AIDS case projections through 1990 than those based on the method of extrapolation. Relative to the method of extrapolation, this method projects 22,000 fewer new AIDS cases for 1995 (a 36 percent difference). This method also projects that intravenous drug users will replace homosexual/bisexual men as the dominant transmission category for AIDS.

Suggested Citation

  • David E. Bloom & Sherry Glied, 1992. "Projecting the Number of New AIDS Cases in the U.S," NBER Working Papers 4180, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:4180
    Note: EH
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w4180.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Becker, M.H. & Joseph, J.G., 1988. "AIDS and behavioral change to reduce risk: A review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 78(4), pages 394-410.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katherine B. Coffman & Lucas C. Coffman & Keith M. Marzilli Ericson, 2017. "The Size of the LGBT Population and the Magnitude of Antigay Sentiment Are Substantially Underestimated," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(10), pages 3168-3186, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ceddia, M.G. & Bardsley, N.O. & Goodwin, R. & Holloway, G.J. & Nocella, G. & Stasi, A., 2013. "A complex system perspective on the emergence and spread of infectious diseases: Integrating economic and ecological aspects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 124-131.
    2. Michael Hennessy, 1994. "Adolescent Syndromes of Risk for HIV Infection," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(3), pages 312-341, June.
    3. Jay Cross & Cynthia Saunders & Debra Bartelli, 1998. "The Effectiveness of Educational and Needle Exchange Programs: A Meta-analysis of HIV Prevention Strategies for Injecting Drug Users," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 165-180, May.
    4. Floris Goerlandt & Jie Li & Genserik Reniers, 2021. "The Landscape of Risk Perception Research: A Scientometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Marlène Guillon & Josselin Thuilliez, 2015. "HIV and Rational risky behaviors: a systematic review of published empirical literature (1990-2013)," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 15065, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    6. Edward H. Kaplan & Paul R. Abramson, 1989. "So What If the Program Ain't Perfect?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 13(2), pages 107-122, April.
    7. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-01222571 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Steven D. Pinkerton & Paul R. Abramson, 1993. "Evaluating the Risks," Evaluation Review, , vol. 17(5), pages 504-528, October.
    9. Unji Baek & Seul Ki Lee, 2023. "Pandemic Dining Dilemmas: Exploring the Determinants of Korean Consumer Dining-Out Behavior during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Auld, M. Christopher, 2003. "Choices, beliefs, and infectious disease dynamics," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 361-377, May.
    11. Janka Kopaničová & Dana Vokounová, 2023. "Cultural Differences in Coping with Changes in the External Environment: A Case of Behavioural Segmentation of Senior Consumers Based on Their Reaction to the COVID-19 Pandemic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(3), pages 21-46.
    12. Paul R. Abramson & Joan C. Sekler & Richard Berk & Monique Y. Cloud, 1989. "An Evaluation of an Undergraduate Course On Aids," Evaluation Review, , vol. 13(5), pages 516-532, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:4180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.