IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/27801.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Coasean Approaches to Ending Overfishing: Bigeye Tuna Conservation in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Ovando
  • Gary D. Libecap
  • Katherine D. Millage
  • Lennon Thomas

Abstract

Bigeye tuna in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean were perceived as overfished for nearly 20 years, in large part due to incidental catch in the much larger skipjack tuna fishery. Efforts to halt the overfishing of bigeye stalled due to disagreements over the distribution of costs and benefits from reform. An alternative Coasean-style approach to setting both harvesting levels and the allocation of costs and benefits might offer a path forward. We calculate the costs and benefits of achieving bigeye conservation goals and describe an exchange through which benefits could be realized via removal of Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs). Through trade, aggregate benefits and costs are more apt to be in balance relative to mandated protection controls. The realities of bargaining costs in a multilateral setting are not underappreciated, but in light of existing stalemates in this and other fisheries, consideration of Coasean-style approaches is warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Ovando & Gary D. Libecap & Katherine D. Millage & Lennon Thomas, 2020. "Coasean Approaches to Ending Overfishing: Bigeye Tuna Conservation in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean," NBER Working Papers 27801, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27801
    Note: DEV EEE LE PE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w27801.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrice Guillotreau & Frédéric Salladarré & Patrice Dewals & Laurent Dagorn, 2011. "Fishing tuna around Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) vs free swimming schools: Skipper decision and other determining factors," Post-Print halshs-00632070, HAL.
    2. Kristensen, Kasper & Nielsen, Anders & Berg, Casper W. & Skaug, Hans & Bell, Bradley M., 2016. "TMB: Automatic Differentiation and Laplace Approximation," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(i05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katie Wilson & Jon Wakefield, 2022. "A probabilistic model for analyzing summary birth history data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(11), pages 291-344.
    2. Alec B. M. Van Helsdingen & Tiago A. Marques & Charlotte M. Jones-Todd, 2025. "An Inhomogeneous Weibull–Hawkes Process to Model Underdispersed Acoustic Cues," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 30(1), pages 39-62, March.
    3. David M Keith & Jessica A Sameoto & Freya M Keyser & Christine A Ward-Paige, 2020. "Evaluating socio-economic and conservation impacts of management: A case study of time-area closures on Georges Bank," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Ben C. Stevenson & Rachel M. Fewster & Koustubh Sharma, 2022. "Spatial correlation structures for detections of individuals in spatial capture–recapture models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 963-973, September.
    5. Yuan Yan & Eva Cantoni & Chris Field & Margaret Treble & Joanna Mills Flemming, 2023. "Spatiotemporal modeling of mature‐at‐length data using a sliding window approach," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), March.
    6. Xin Jin, 2021. "Can we imitate the principal investor's behavior to learn option price?," Papers 2105.11376, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    7. François-Charles Wolff & Dale Squires & Patrice Guillotreau, 2013. "The Firm's Management in Production: Management, Firm, and Time Effects in an Indian Ocean Tuna Fishery," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 95(3), pages 547-567.
    8. Han, Jeongseop & Lee, Youngjo, 2024. "Enhanced Laplace approximation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Benny Ren & Ian Barnett, 2023. "Combining mixed effects hidden Markov models with latent alternating recurrent event processes to model diurnal active–rest cycles," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3402-3417, December.
    10. Aaron Osgood‐Zimmerman & Jon Wakefield, 2023. "A Statistical Review of Template Model Builder: A Flexible Tool for Spatial Modelling," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(2), pages 318-342, August.
    11. Henrique Aparecido Laureano & Ricardo Rasmussen Petterle & Guilherme Parreira da Silva & Paulo Justiniano Ribeiro Junior & Wagner Hugo Bonat, 2024. "A multinomial generalized linear mixed model for clustered competing risks data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 1417-1434, May.
    12. Øystein Sørensen & Anders M. Fjell & Kristine B. Walhovd, 2023. "Longitudinal Modeling of Age-Dependent Latent Traits with Generalized Additive Latent and Mixed Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 456-486, June.
    13. David L. Miller & Richard Glennie & Andrew E. Seaton, 2020. "Understanding the Stochastic Partial Differential Equation Approach to Smoothing," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(1), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Théo Michelot & Richard Glennie & Catriona Harris & Len Thomas, 2021. "Varying-Coefficient Stochastic Differential Equations with Applications in Ecology," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(3), pages 446-463, September.
    15. Jenni Niku & Francis K. C. Hui & Sara Taskinen & David I. Warton, 2021. "Analyzing environmental‐trait interactions in ecological communities with fourth‐corner latent variable models," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), September.
    16. Jenni Niku & David I. Warton & Francis K. C. Hui & Sara Taskinen, 2017. "Generalized Linear Latent Variable Models for Multivariate Count and Biomass Data in Ecology," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 498-522, December.
    17. Yan Cui & Qi Li & Fukang Zhu, 2020. "Flexible bivariate Poisson integer-valued GARCH model," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(6), pages 1449-1477, December.
    18. Riki Herliansyah & Ruth King & Stuart King, 2022. "Laplace Approximations for Capture–Recapture Models in the Presence of Individual Heterogeneity," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(3), pages 401-418, September.
    19. Flores-Agreda, Daniel & Cantoni, Eva, 2019. "Bootstrap estimation of uncertainty in prediction for generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-17.
    20. Davies, Tim K. & Mees, Chris C. & Milner-Gulland, E.J., 2014. "The past, present and future use of drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Indian Ocean," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 163-170.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q22 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Fishery
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.