IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mse/cesdoc/11027.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Remanufacturing

Author

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretical model of remanufacturing where a duopoly of original manufacturers produces a component of a final good. The specific component that needs to be replaced during the lifetime of the final good creates a secondary market where independent remanufacturers enter the competition. An environmental regulation imposing a minimum level of remanufacturability is also introduced. The main results establish that, while collusion of the firms on the level of remanufacturability increases both profit and consumer surplus, a social planner could use collusion as a substitute for an environmental regulation. However, if an environmental regulation is to be implemented, collusion should be repressed since competition supports the public intervention better. Under certain circumstances, the environmental regulation can increase both profit and consumer surplus. Part of this result supports the Porter Hypothesis, which stipulates that industries respecting environmental regulations can see their profits increase

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Bernard, 2011. "Remanufacturing," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 11027, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    • Handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:11027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://mse.univ-paris1.fr/pub/mse/CES2011/11027.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lebreton, Baptiste & Tuma, Axel, 2006. "A quantitative approach to assessing the profitability of car and truck tire remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 639-652, December.
    2. d'Aspremont, Claude & Jacquemin, Alexis, 1988. "Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(5), pages 1133-1137, December.
    3. Giutini, Ron & Gaudette, Kevin, 2003. "Remanufacturing: The next great opportunity for boosting US productivity," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 41-48.
    4. Don Fullerton & Wenbo Wu, 2002. "Policies for Green Design," Chapters, in: Don Fullerton & Thomas C. Kinnaman (ed.), The Economics of Household Garbage and Recycling Behavior, chapter 5, pages 102-119, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Michael Waldman, 2010. "Competition, Monopoly, and Aftermarkets," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 54-91, April.
    6. Paul Klemperer, 1995. "Competition when Consumers have Switching Costs: An Overview with Applications to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics, and International Trade," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 62(4), pages 515-539.
    7. Cellini, Roberto & Lambertini, Luca, 2009. "Dynamic R&D with spillovers: Competition vs cooperation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 568-582, March.
    8. Maia David & Bernard Sinclair-Desgagné, 2005. "Environmental Regulation and the Eco-Industry," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 141-155, September.
    9. Geraldo Ferrer & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2006. "Managing New and Remanufactured Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 15-26, January.
    10. Mitra, Supriya & Webster, Scott, 2008. "Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 287-298, February.
    11. Laurens G. Debo & L. Beril Toktay & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2005. "Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1193-1205, August.
    12. Kiesmuller, Gudrun P. & van der Laan, Erwin A., 2001. "An inventory model with dependent product demands and returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 73-87, June.
    13. Chung, Chun-Jen & Wee, Hui-Ming, 2008. "Green-component life-cycle value on design and reverse manufacturing in semi-closed supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 528-545, June.
    14. Eichner, Thomas & Pethig, Rudiger, 2001. "Product Design and Efficient Management of Recycling and Waste Treatment," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 109-134, January.
    15. Thomas Eichner & Marco Runkel, 2005. "Efficient Policies for Green Design in a Vintage Durable Good Model," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 30(3), pages 259-278, March.
    16. Andr, Francisco J. & Gonzlez, Paula & Porteiro, Nicols, 2009. "Strategic quality competition and the Porter Hypothesis," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 182-194, March.
    17. Heese, Hans S. & Cattani, Kyle & Ferrer, Geraldo & Gilland, Wendell & Roth, Aleda V., 2005. "Competitive advantage through take-back of used products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 143-157, July.
    18. Canton, Joan, 2008. "Redealing the cards: How an eco-industry modifies the political economy of environmental taxes," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 295-315, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph & Lai, Kee-hung, 2015. "Reprint of “Supply chain-based barriers for truck-engine remanufacturing in China”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 94-108.
    2. Bernard, Sophie & Hotte, Louis & Winer, Stanley L., 2014. "Democracy, inequality and the environment when citizens can mitigate health consequences of pollution privately or act collectively," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 142-156.
    3. Abdullah Alfaify & Mustafa Saleh & Fawaz M. Abdullah & Abdulrahman M. Al-Ahmari, 2020. "Design for Additive Manufacturing: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu & Li, Gendao & Chan, Hing-Kai & Xiong, Zhongkai, 2013. "Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 15-25.
    2. Wu, Xiaole & Zhou, Yu, 2019. "Buyer-specific versus uniform pricing in a closed-loop supply chain with third-party remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 548-560.
    3. Kangzhou Wang & Yingxue Zhao & Yonghong Cheng & Tsan-Ming Choi, 2014. "Cooperation or Competition? Channel Choice for a Remanufacturing Fashion Supply Chain with Government Subsidy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Chen, Chialin & Liu, Lucy Qian, 2014. "Pricing and quality decisions and financial incentives for sustainable product design with recycled material content under price leadership," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PC), pages 666-677.
    5. Bulmus, Serra Caner & Zhu, Stuart X. & Teunter, Ruud, 2014. "Competition for cores in remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 105-113.
    6. Chen, Jen-Ming & Chang, Chia-I, 2012. "The co-opetitive strategy of a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 387-400.
    7. Cetin, Can Baris & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "Remanufacturing with innovative features: A strategic analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 655-669.
    8. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Hamid Beladi, 2017. "A game model of competition between a new good producer and a remanufacturer using negative advertising," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 329-336, October.
    9. Batabyal Amitrajeet A. & Beladi Hamid, 2018. "Advertising and Competition for Market Share between a New Good Producer and a Remanufacturer," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 113-118, February.
    10. Xue, Dongmei & Teunter, Ruud H. & Zhu, Stuart X. & Zhou, Weihua, 2021. "Entering the high-end market by collecting and remanufacturing a competitor’s high-end cores," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Han, Xiaohua & Yang, Qianxia & Shang, Jennifer & Pu, Xujin, 2017. "Optimal strategies for trade-old-for-remanufactured programs: Receptivity, durability, and subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 602-616.
    12. Sophie Bernard, 2019. "Multidimensional Green Product Design," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(4), pages 1183-1202, April.
    13. Ma, Peng & Gong, Yeming & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2020. "Trade-in for remanufactured products: Pricing with double reference effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Chen, Yenming J., 2012. "Impact of government financial intervention on competition among green supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 201-213.
    15. Chang Fang & Zhuangzhuang You & Yudou Yang & Duomei Chen & Samar Mukhopadhyay, 2020. "Is third-party remanufacturing necessarily harmful to the original equipment manufacturer?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 317-338, August.
    16. Xiaohua Han & Ying Shen & Yiwen Bian, 2020. "Optimal recovery strategy of manufacturers: Remanufacturing products or recycling materials?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 463-489, July.
    17. Kaya, Onur, 2010. "Incentive and production decisions for remanufacturing operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 442-453, March.
    18. Chen, Jen-Ming & Chang, Chia-I, 2013. "Dynamic pricing for new and remanufactured products in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 153-160.
    19. Mitra, Supriya & Webster, Scott, 2008. "Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 287-298, February.
    20. Zhou, Yu & Xiong, Yu & Jin, Minyue, 2021. "Less is more: Consumer education in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Remanufacturing; competition; environmental regulation; Porter hypothesis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:11027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucie Label (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cenp1fr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.