IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mon/ceddtr/28.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gains féminins, allocation des biens et statut nutritionnel des enfants au Burkina Faso

Author

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to provide an econometric test to the relative validity of collective and unitary household behavior models, with the help of data of the 1994_95 Burkina Faso household survey. Obtained results seem to justify conclusions of noncooperative approach where the well_being of the group is partly function of the identity of the income earner, the African anthropological literature and what one observes commonly as for the functioning of households on this continent. On the one hand, the estimation of demand functions indicates that the share of wives income influences significantly, positively food expenses and energy, and negatively expenses to cigarettes, tobacco and moving household equipment.The analysis shows that there would be no variation in food household expense if total expenses fell by 2,6 percent, with respect to the average provided this was accompagnied by re_allocating all incomes to wives. On the other hand, reduced nutrition equations suggest that, all others things being equal, more the share of woman income of household grows, more the probability of malnutrition - height-for-age, weight-for-age and weight-for-height- of children of less of 60 month decreases. Furthermore, while the geographical location, the education of mothers, the structure by age of children and the access to collective health services and education influence the nutrition of children, coefficients of the weight_for_age and the chronic malnutrition appear statistically different according to the gender, and suggest an differential effect to the advantage of boys inherent to the share of wives income. Although of considerations of equity and efficiency could justify this situation, the adherence to rules of the game of the traditional society institutions is probably an explanation more convincing than the foundation in pure rationality terms, even if the connection between the two has to be kept in mind. Results of the present researches have economic policy implications, to the extent of the modification of intra_household distribution of income is a means to increase food expenses, to reduce relative expenses to the tobacco and to raise the nutritional status of children - although, in this last case, boys are relatively more favored than girls. Similarly, the increase of women education and the extension of collective goods concerning health and education, notably in rural areas, constitute powerful factors susceptible to contribute to a best antrhopometric status ofchildren. (Full text in French)

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Pierre Lachaud, 1998. "Gains féminins, allocation des biens et statut nutritionnel des enfants au Burkina Faso," Documents de travail 28, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
  • Handle: RePEc:mon:ceddtr:28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ged.u-bordeaux4.fr/ceddt28.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charlotte Fontan, 2006. "« L’outil » filière agricole pour le développement rural," Documents de travail 124, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    2. Jean-Pierre Lachaud, 2001. "Modélisation des déterminants de la mortalité des enfants et pauvreté aux Comores," Documents de travail 53, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    3. repec:ilo:ilowps:356565 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mon:ceddtr:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.