IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mlb/wpaper/549.html

The Optimal Management of Research Portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Bardsley, P.

Abstract

Risky research projects are, other things being equal, intrinsically harder to monitor than those which are less risky. It is shown, using agency theory that a standard cost benefit analysis which ignores the agency problem will introduce a bias towards excessively risky projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Bardsley, P., 1997. "The Optimal Management of Research Portfolios," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 549, The University of Melbourne.
    • Handle: RePEc:mlb:wpaper:549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stoneham, Gary & Strappazzon, Loris & Soligo, James & Fisher, Bill & Eigenraam, Mark & Wimalasuriya, Rukman, 2000. "Evaluation Of Research Activities," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123645, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Susan Xu Tang & Yongsheng Xu, 2024. "Multiple prizes for multiple tasks: externalities and the optimal design of tournaments," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 291-303, August.
    3. Omuru, Eric & Kingwell, Ross S., 2005. "Funding and Managing Agricultural Research in a Developing Country: a Papua New Guinea case study," 2005 Conference (49th), February 9-11, 2005, Coff's Harbour, Australia 137938, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. X. Zhao & J.D. Mullen & G.R. Griffith & R.R. Piggott & W.E. Griffiths, 2002. "The Economic Incidence of R&D and Promotion Investments in the Australian Beef Industry," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 16/02, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    5. Bert Lenaerts & Yann de Mey & Matty Demont, 2022. "Revisiting multi‐stage models for upstream technology adoption: Evidence from rapid generation advance in rice breeding," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 277-300, February.
    6. Kingwell, Ross S., 1999. "Institutional and social influences on R&D evaluation in agriculture," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 43(01), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mlb:wpaper:549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dandapani Lokanathan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/demelau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.