IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lvl/laeccr/9416.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Incentives, Team Production, Transactions Costs, and the Optimal Contract: Estimates of an Agency Model using Payroll Records

Author

Listed:
  • FERRALL, Christopher
  • SHEARER, Bruce

Abstract

We apply agency theory to the payroll records of a copper mine that paid a production bonus to teams of workers. As with most incentive pay used by firms, the bonus was simpler in form than the optimal contract that balances incentives, insurance, and free-riding. We explore whether transactions costs help explain this discrepancy. We estimate an agency model for the payroll data using the method of maximum likelihood and find that incentives and free-riding within teams accounted for two-thirds of the bonus system's inefficiency relative to potential full information profits. The remaining one-third of the inefficiency is attributed to the form of the incentive contract as constrained by transactions costs. We discuss alternative explanations and the general empirical content of agency theory. Nous appliquons la théorie de l'agence aux payes colligées à partir des archives d'une mine de cuivre. Cette mine payait des équipes de travailleurs avec un système de primes. Comme la plupart des systèmes d'incitation qui sont utilisés par les firmes, ce système de primes était plus simple que le contrat optimal qui équilibre les incitations, l'assurance et le free-riding. Pour expliquer ce désaccord, nous faisons l'hypothèse que les coûts de transactions associés avec l'implantation des contrats sont importants pour la détermination de la forme des contrats implantés. Nous utilisons les méthodes du maximum de vraisemblance pour estimer l'importance des coûts de transactions pour le choix de la forme du contrat observé dans cette mine. Notre stratégie d'estimation incorpore les restrictions impliquées par un modèle d'agence développé pour les salaires payés par la mine. Nos résultats impliquent que les incitations et le free-riding parmi les membres des équipes comptent pour deux-tiers de l'inefficacité du système de primes par rapport aux profits atteignables dans le cadre de l'information complète. L'autre tiers de l'inefficacité du système est attribuable à la forme du co
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • FERRALL, Christopher & SHEARER, Bruce, 1994. "Incentives, Team Production, Transactions Costs, and the Optimal Contract: Estimates of an Agency Model using Payroll Records," Cahiers de recherche 9416, Université Laval - Département d'économique.
  • Handle: RePEc:lvl:laeccr:9416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paarsch, Harry J & Shearer, Bruce, 2000. "Piece Rates, Fixed Wages, and Incentive Effects: Statistical Evidence from Payroll Records," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 41(1), pages 59-92, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C4 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics
    • D2 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations
    • J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lvl:laeccr:9416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuel Paradis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/delvlca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.