IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The role of stocks and shocks concepts in the debate over price vs. quantity


  • John E. Parsons
  • Luca Taschini


Many economists and policy makers have long favored the use of a price instrument tocontrol greenhouse gases because they are a stock pollutant and as such the marginal benefit of abatement is relatively flat. While the early literature on the problem isconsistent with this view, the later literature is less categorical. It showed that thechoice between a price or quantity control depends, in part, upon the assumptionon the dynamic structure of cost uncertainty. Temporary shocks to abatement costfavors the use of a price control, while permanent shocks favor a quantity control.Unfortunately, the importance of this assumption to the optimal choice has not yetreceived wide currency among economists. We analyze the problem in an alternativesetting and reproduce the result that temporary shocks favor use of a price controlwhile permanent shocks favor use of a quantity control. Our contribution is thesimplicity of the model and the accessibility of the results, which reinforce the criticalrole played by the assumed structure of uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • John E. Parsons & Luca Taschini, 2011. "The role of stocks and shocks concepts in the debate over price vs. quantity," GRI Working Papers 43, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  • Handle: RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp43

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Martin L. Weitzman, 1974. "Prices vs. Quantities," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 41(4), pages 477-491.
    2. Stavins, Robert N., 1996. "Correlated Uncertainty and Policy Instrument Choice," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 218-232, March.
    3. Newell, Richard G. & Pizer, William A., 2003. "Regulating stock externalities under uncertainty," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2, Supple), pages 416-432, March.
    4. Hoel, Michael & Karp, Larry, 2002. "Taxes versus quotas for a stock pollutant," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 367-384, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (The GRI Administration). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.