The role of stocks and shocks concepts in the debate over price vs. quantity
Many economists and policy makers have long favored the use of a price instrument tocontrol greenhouse gases because they are a stock pollutant and as such the marginal benefit of abatement is relatively flat. While the early literature on the problem isconsistent with this view, the later literature is less categorical. It showed that thechoice between a price or quantity control depends, in part, upon the assumptionon the dynamic structure of cost uncertainty. Temporary shocks to abatement costfavors the use of a price control, while permanent shocks favor a quantity control.Unfortunately, the importance of this assumption to the optimal choice has not yetreceived wide currency among economists. We analyze the problem in an alternativesetting and reproduce the result that temporary shocks favor use of a price controlwhile permanent shocks favor use of a quantity control. Our contribution is thesimplicity of the model and the accessibility of the results, which reinforce the criticalrole played by the assumed structure of uncertainty.
|Date of creation:||Mar 2011|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE|
Phone: +44 (020) 7405 7686
Web page: http://www.lse.ac.uk/grantham.
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Martin L. Weitzman, 1974.
"Prices vs. Quantities,"
Review of Economic Studies,
Oxford University Press, vol. 41(4), pages 477-491.
- M. L. Weitzman, 1973. "Prices vs. Quantities," Working papers 106, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
- Hoel, Michael & Karp, Larry, 2002. "Taxes versus quotas for a stock pollutant," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 367-384, November.
- Hoel, Michael & Karp, Larry, 2001. "Taxes versus Quotas for a Stock Pollutant," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt5fx9p7kf, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
- Stavins, Robert N., 1996. "Correlated Uncertainty and Policy Instrument Choice," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 218-232, March.
- Newell, Richard G. & Pizer, William A., 2003. "Regulating stock externalities under uncertainty," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2, Supple), pages 416-432, March.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (The GRI Administration)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.