IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lms/mansci/mrg-0011.html

List Pricing versus Dynamic Pricing: Impact on the Revenue Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Koenig

    (Department of Management Science, Lancaster University Management School)

  • Joern Meissner

    (Department of Management Science, Lancaster University Management School)

Abstract

We consider the problem of a firm selling multiple products that consume a single resource over a finite time period. The amount of the resource is exogenously fixed. We analyze the difference between a dynamic pricing policy and a list price capacity control policy. The dynamic pricing policy adjusts prices steadily resolving the underlying problem every time step, whereas the list pricing policy sets static prices once but controls the capacity by allowing or preventing product sales. As steady price changes are often costly or unachievable in practice, we investigate the question of how much riskier it is to apply a list pricing policy rather than a dynamic pricing policy. We conduct several numerical experiments and compare expected revenue, standard deviation, and conditional-value-at-risk between the pricing policies. The differences between the policies show that list pricing can be a useful strategy when dynamic pricing is costly or impractical.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Koenig & Joern Meissner, 2008. "List Pricing versus Dynamic Pricing: Impact on the Revenue Risk," Working Papers MRG/0011, Department of Management Science, Lancaster University, revised Apr 2009.
  • Handle: RePEc:lms:mansci:mrg-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.meiss.com/en/publications/list-dynamic-pricing-revenue-risk.html
    File Function: Webpage
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schlosser, Rainer & Gönsch, Jochen, 2023. "Risk-averse dynamic pricing using mean-semivariance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1151-1163.
    2. Marla, Lavanya & Rikun, Alexander & Stauffer, Gautier & Pratsini, Eleni, 2020. "Robust modeling and planning: Insights from three industrial applications," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    3. Koenig, Matthias & Meissner, Joern, 2015. "Value-at-risk optimal policies for revenue management problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 11-19.
    4. Bernardo Bertoldi & Chiara Giachino & Alberto Pastore, 2016. "Strategic pricing management in the omnichannel era," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(4), pages 131-152.
    5. Sato, Kimitoshi & Sawaki, Katsushige, 2013. "A continuous-time dynamic pricing model knowing the competitor’s pricing strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 223-229.
    6. Jochen Gönsch & Michael Hassler & Rouven Schur, 2018. "Optimizing conditional value-at-risk in dynamic pricing," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(3), pages 711-750, July.
    7. Schlosser, Rainer & Gönsch, Jochen, 2025. "Mean-variance optimization in finite horizon Markov decision processes and its application to revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 325(3), pages 516-524.
    8. Ming Chen & Zhi-Long Chen, 2018. "Robust Dynamic Pricing with Two Substitutable Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 249-268, May.
    9. Elifnas Ertekin & J. B. G. Frenk & Canan Pehlivan & Andrei Sleptchenko, 2025. "Procurement, Dynamic Pricing, and Early Exit Decisions for Products with Short Life Cycles," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 1-27, September.
    10. Kuo, Chia-Wei & Huang, Kwei-Long, 2012. "Dynamic pricing of limited inventories for multi-generation products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 394-403.
    11. Catherine Cleophas & Daniel Kadatz & Sebastian Vock, 2017. "Resilient revenue management: a literature survey of recent theoretical advances," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(5), pages 483-498, October.
    12. Franz Wirl, 2010. "Optimal Pricing of Nondurables when Demand is Dynamic and Stochastic," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 187-206.
    13. R. Schlosser, 2021. "Scalable relaxation techniques to solve stochastic dynamic multi-product pricing problems with substitution effects," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(1), pages 54-65, February.
    14. Basu, Sanjay, 2011. "Comparing simulation models for market risk stress testing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 329-339, August.
    15. Schur, Rouven & Gönsch, Jochen & Hassler, Michael, 2019. "Time-consistent, risk-averse dynamic pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 587-603.
    16. Sun, Shuxiao & Zheng, Xiaona & Sun, Luping, 2020. "Multi-period pricing in the presence of competition and social influence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    17. Gönsch, Jochen, 2017. "A survey on risk-averse and robust revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 337-348.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lms:mansci:mrg-0011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joern Meissner The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Joern Meissner to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/degraus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.