IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lis/liswps/900.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bad Policies and the Erosion of Trust in Comparative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • David Jesuit
  • Thomas Greitens

Abstract

This chapter considers the comparative impact of ineffective policies on declining trust in government and its impact on the policy process. It relies on the most recent module from the 2016 International Social Survey Program’s (ISSP) series on the “Role of Government,” which was only recently made available to researchers. This survey measures individual satisfaction with several policy outcomes, as well as the fairness of bureaucratic processes and trust in government. Ineffective policy is operationalized using two approaches derived from these data, both of which are based on respondents’ evaluation of public policies in different countries. The first approach emphasizes perceptions of policy effectiveness in providing health care, maintaining adequate standards of living, and managing national security threats. The second approach emphasizes perceptions of negative policy outcomes requiring changes in spending levels across a variety of policy domains. Results from multilevel models suggest that when the public perceives policy ineffectiveness, their trust in government and perceptions of bureaucratic fairness decline. As a result, the ability of the public to use the policy process to transform ineffective policies erodes and public accountability over the policy process disappears, resulting in a downward spiral of bad policy outcomes and declining trust in public servants and institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • David Jesuit & Thomas Greitens, 2025. "Bad Policies and the Erosion of Trust in Comparative Perspective," LIS Working papers 900, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/900.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piotr Paradowski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lisprlu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.